Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+The\s+dreaded\s+QSO\s+B4\s+macro\s+\(was\:\s+RTTY\s+WPX\s+ZC4LI\s+SOSB\/20\s+HP\)\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] The dreaded QSO B4 macro (was: RTTY WPX ZC4LI SOSB/20 HP) (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:48:45 -0600
Jim, When this happens to me, I don't log them. It's their loss and their NIL during log checking. Although I suspect many don't even submit a log. An interesting case in point: Yesterday I received
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00149.html (10,403 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] The dreaded QSO B4 macro (was: RTTY WPX ZC4LI SOSB/20 HP) (score: 1)
Author: W6SX Hank Garretson <w6sx@npgcable.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:01:08 -0800
I had a good experience with "The dreaded QSO B4 macro" in CQ WPX. I called a chap, and he immediately responded with something on the order of "QSO B4 0053Z 9 Nov 2008." I didn't argue with him, alt
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00164.html (7,754 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] The dreaded QSO B4 macro (was: RTTY WPX ZC4LI SOSB/20 HP) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:07:40 -0800
Hi Hank But, if he'd just worked you, you both would have won anyway, and in less time :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00174.html (8,774 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] The dreaded QSO B4 macro (was: RTTY WPX ZC4LI SOSB/20 HP) (score: 1)
Author: W6SX Hank Garretson <w6sx@npgcable.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:46:47 -0800
Good point. Maybe he would have won and I would have lost. Not sure how they score something like that. Perhaps I would have been penalized for busting the first QSO call. He probably would (should)
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00177.html (8,696 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu