Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+missing\s+out\s+the\s+dash\s+between\s+serial\s+No\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Thoughts\s+on\s+missing\s+out\s+the\s+dash\s+between\s+serial\s+No\'s\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Thoughts on missing out the dash between serial No's (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net (Phil Cooper); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:47:05 -0000; Hi all, As someone suggested on this reflector, I decided to remove the dashes in between the serial numbers sent for the BARTG Sprint, and I have to say, I had far fewer repeat requests! I've always; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00330.html (7,946 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Thoughts on missing out the dash between serial No's (score: 1): Author: w1zt@mediaone.net (George Johnson); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:43:02 -0500; Phil and All, Yes, I have adopted a similar approach. I did not operate enough in this past contest to confirm results but I had only one request for a repeat. On a repeat, I use 000-000 000 000 BK t; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00336.html (9,074 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]