Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Topband\:\s+160m\s+in\s+RTTY\s+Contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Topband\:\s+160m\s+in\s+RTTY\s+Contests\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:03:55 -0400; While it is certainly possible to make QSOs using RTTY on 160 meters, it is far from optimum given the constant multipath conditions and poor SNR that exists on the band. It would certainly be possi; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00262.html (12,968 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:36:31 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Chen, with all due respect, I think you spend too much time modeling propagation and not enough time on the air actually doing it. I have no idea what the "Watterson propagat; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00263.html (12,058 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:44:45 -0400; There goes Bill again ... writing what he "wishes" were true without any understanding of the physics behind the subject and ignoring the experts in the field. 45 baud, 170 Hz FSK has a well establi; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00264.html (10,740 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine AC0C" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:46:10 -0500; Joe, Humans are not optimized to climb Everest. They do it for the challenge - to see if, despite the challenges, it can be done. So if a guy wants to bang his head against the multi-path wall trying; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00265.html (11,868 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:26:22 -0700; On the air? You mean I need to transmit to discover what propagation conditions are like? Many of us who are primarily interested in signal demodulation and propagation spend day and night _listening; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00000.html (9,979 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anderso@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:01:11 -0800; Ed, A 12 or 24 hour format might work for a test. RITTY works great with it's mulitpath function (detector) and other ionospheric dispersion problems. 73 Charles/kk5oq --Original Message-- From: rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00001.html (13,162 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:44:45 -0500; Let's see ... that means I should be free to yell "Fire!" the next time I go to the theater, drive past the school your children or grandchildren attend at 120 MPH, burn old tires on the lot next to; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00004.html (11,634 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 07:20:30 -0800; No Joe... If it violates a law, it's not permitted as a pursuit of happiness. The scenarios you have detailed below violate laws and endanger people. Operating 160 RTTY doesn't violate any laws or en; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00005.html (13,367 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: Jay <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:27:42 -0800; Lots of hardware TU's do this as well. Its called AM. Only problem with RITTY is that its essentially no longer useful. It also requires diddle to work. Turn this off and RITTY doesn't copy hardly at; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00006.html (8,721 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 10:57:24 -0500; The scenarios I detailed are not universally outlawed just like RTTY on 160 meters is not universally outlawed (it is outlawed in some countries). The scenarios show that just because you can do som; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00010.html (16,337 bytes)
31. [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <na8w@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:34:02 -0500; It appears that the topic is denigrating a bit. We are hams and as hams we have always tried new things. Why not try something on a "new" band and see what works. There have been many replies that ar; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00012.html (8,349 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:39:31 -0500; A comment - I don' t think the early experimenters "eventually chose" FSK - OOK was the only legal mode. We were not allowed FSK on the HF bands until Jan 1, 1953 by the FCC. FSK use started as soon; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00013.html (8,669 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 32
Page: [1] [2]