Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+VP6DX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+VP6DX\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:47:24 -0600; Loud on 14.089 listening UP, UP (at 0045z). Took a while, but I got them. :) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! "The only sure bulwark of continuing liberty is a government st; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00351.html (6,485 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "Lee Ratcliff" <lratcliff@isp.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:41:55 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time); I lucked out, and copied the guy he was talking to. Called once, and he got me. Worked him on 20 RTTY, and 12m SSB both tonight. That's odd for after dark here in VA. Sparky KC4ART --Original Message; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00354.html (7,749 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:50:18 -0800; Worked him first call with 100 watts on 20 RTTY and CW. 73 Jim W7RY Loud on 14.089 listening UP, UP (at 0045z). Took a while, but I got them. :) -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Tr; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00355.html (7,099 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: Jon Maguire <w1mnk@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:08:54 -0500; Guys, how long does it take a contact to make it into their online log? Thank you. 73... Jon W1MNK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00364.html (7,755 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: Steve AI9T <steve@ai9t.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:15:55 -0500; Jon From what I've seen so far it usually takes 1 to 3 days for a QSO to show up in their log. I think today is their last day so I would guess their online logs will be caught up by tomorrow evening; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00365.html (8,642 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: Jon Maguire <w1mnk@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:02:15 -0500; Thanks guys for pointing out when the logs are update. Shucks, I thought they had me on 17M RTTY... guess not. Better luck next time. I should do some RTTY testing to make sure all is in order. This; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00368.html (8,571 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:25:08 -0600; They have all my Qs except 17 m phone, so maybe the 17 m logs are slower to show up? I have noted that it sometimes takes longer for Qs to show up than the date they list on the site would indicate.; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00369.html (8,101 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:33:45 -0800; From their news page, VP6DX has already exceeded the previous RTTY record held by N8S. That is quite an accomplishment, considering that VP6DX only operated RTTY (so far :-) on 3 bands. My N8S log sh; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00371.html (9,783 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:32:02 -0500 (EST); Yep, they've raised the bar again. It's going to be hard to make it over that one. They didn't do any EME, SSTV, satellites (but that would be pretty useless right now) or PSK, all of which are time-; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00372.html (8,220 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:59:01 -0600; Marginally better at 45 baud. Better would be pinning the coax of the station transmitting on the DX's Mark frequency. Or others learning what "DOWN" means ... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00374.html (8,739 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:25:22 -0600; This is very interesting, why is this? I thought the speed was set by the software? Charlie Ki5xp _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00377.html (8,822 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:13:33 -0800; The baud rate of the FSK port in the microHAM keyers (microKeyer, digiKeyer, microKeyer II) is set using an integer whose value is 2700/ rate. Integer values that give baud rates that are closest to; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00379.html (10,835 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:58:50 -0500; This is, or should be, a non-issue. The less than 1% error is less than the clock error of many UARTs and/or USB to serial converters Hardware UARTs generally include PLL clock recovery circuits (th; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00383.html (14,382 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]