- 1. [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:26:20 -0000
- Hi all, I am sure most of you know all about QTC's, what they are, and how to handle them. However, each year, there are loads of stations who simply don't know how to handle them, and say "SRI NO QT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00071.html (13,498 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1)
- Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:46:49 -0500
- One more comment about QTCs. To my surprise, in the past, quite a few stations have asked for my QTCs on 80m. Unless you are very loud, I generally decline. Why? Because with all the noise on 80m, it
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00072.html (15,195 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1)
- Author: f6irf@free.fr
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:13:01 +0100
- Goetz, Are you sure about this? To be honnest I have serious doubts ! The rule states that "Every QTC that was correctly transferred, counts one point for the sender and one point for the receiver."
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00077.html (8,059 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC + QTC's and how to handle them (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:16:56 +0000
- sender and otherwise QTC's... too Yes it surely has to be like this. If the recipient of the QTCs has sent in a log that doesn't include the QTCs then I would expect the senders QTCs to be dumped fr
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00078.html (9,132 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu