Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Winlink\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Winlink\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: "ws7i" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:57:41 -0700; -- Original Message -- At least get it correctly, Winlink is software not equipment. And what is most interesting is that most of the "current" push is on VHF/UHF and not on HF as the ARRL stuff uses; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00038.html (7,302 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: WI8W <wi8w@wi8w.org>; Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:17:39 +0000; Sorry, I agree that Winlink is actually a software based system. What I was referring to in my post is that the equipment being adopted and promoted by the ARRL to transmit that data is a PACTOR III; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00040.html (6,726 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: Ekki Plicht <ep@plicht.de>; Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:09:13 +0200; Since SCS GmbH (Germany) is the only maker of Pactor-3 capable hardware it is a little bit unfair to say that someone is "in bed" with them. They are the sole supplier if one wants to use Pactor-2 or; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00041.html (8,757 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:24:15 +0000; Are you thinking of "SailMail", a service for non-hams? Essentially the same as WinLink/Airmail, but it works on the marine freqs. I might be wrong, but I don't think it is possible to log into one o; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00042.html (7,460 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:41:03 -0500; Seems i have heard a few hams talking about their calls being bootlegs by some of the sailmail guys.. Tony QBE ZUT DE WA4JQS ANTHONY W. (Tony) DePrato WA4JQS EXTRA - HEAVY Since 1962 CQ DX HALL OF F; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00043.html (7,761 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: Frank Fallon - N2FF <n2ff@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:22:09 +0000; Tom, For a guy who is an ARRL Life Member you sure have a poor opinion of the organization or bad information. Normally I dont post much on the reflector, but As an ARRL Director and a member of the; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00057.html (10,495 bytes)
7. [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: WI8W <rtty@wi8w.org>; Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:50:27 +0000; Frank, Someday, you may get my whole story...but for now, I stand on what I said. I will not argue the point here... ...and yes, I will still work your station in any RTTY contest, no matter where I; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00059.html (6,161 bytes)
8. [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: "Skip Teller" <hteller@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:40:29 -0400; "As an ARRL Director and a member of the ARRL Board Executive Committee that is studying the issue of a "Regulation by Bandwidth Proposal" I feel I must correct some of your blatant errors in fact."; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00101.html (11,662 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Winlink (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Matlock" <k7wm@i10net.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:44:18 -0000; I hope this is/has been forwarded to "bandwidth". I wrote them a lengthy letter listing my objections and wish I had this info to include. Thanks for posting and hopefully everybody will get off thei; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00112.html (14,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]