Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Work\s+dupes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Work\s+dupes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Work dupes (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:07 -0700; Why do some stations insist on telling you that you;re a dupe when you are not a dupe? Last night on 40, I had a W9 station tell me I was a dupe and he gave me his number 31 when he was not in my log; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00092.html (6,971 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Work dupes (score: 1): Author: "V Sidarau" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:32:20 -0400; The today's propagation makes every single QSO unique and memorable. Having just a handful of QSOs I was pleased to hear the first signal from South America in BARTG and called the guy. The response; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00103.html (7,921 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Work dupes (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:40:35 -0400; I work dupes and I believe that it is a poor practice not to. There are so many things that can happen during a contest and it is so easy just to give the report again and move on. One time while ope; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00105.html (7,939 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Work dupes (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:55:24 -0700; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: No doubt your call was in his log, the question is how did it get there? While I love Super Check Partial, I think it might be the culprit sometimes. Whe; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00107.html (7,497 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]