Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+YA\/G0TQJ\/RTTY\s+NAQP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+YA\/G0TQJ\/RTTY\s+NAQP\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] YA/G0TQJ/RTTY NAQP (score: 1): Author: k7wm@i10net.com (k7wm); Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:48:00 -0000; Has anyone heard him on lately?? I been listening faithfully but haven't even seen any posting for him. Anyone know his status?? FYI: two (2) RTTY NAQP's a year are being considered. Slots for the 2n; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-08/msg00041.html (7,206 bytes)
2. [RTTY] YA/G0TQJ/RTTY NAQP (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 16:25:25 -0500; I vote to add 160M to NAQP RTTY. It's probably the only way I'll ever get an antenna up for that band. I heard several stations during NAQP CW this past weekend that I wanted to work but they could n; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-08/msg00042.html (8,444 bytes)
3. [RTTY] YA/G0TQJ/RTTY NAQP (score: 1): Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson); Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:57:05 -0400; Wayne, Not heard YA/G0TQJ lately. My vote on 160m NAQP RTTY. No, unless the pile on 80m gets to a point we need to spread out !!! Feel free to rag chew up there and experiment with signal to noise pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-08/msg00043.html (8,091 bytes)
4. [RTTY] YA/G0TQJ/RTTY NAQP (score: 1): Author: mobile.workshop@guernseytelecoms.com (Mobile Workshop); Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 08:40:34 +0100; Hi Wayne, and all............... First, YA/G0TQJ, I saw a note a while back that he was returning to the UK. That was about 4 - 6 weeks ago, so I guess he is back home now. No clue as to whether he w; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-08/msg00053.html (8,656 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]