Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+contest\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+contest\s+change\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "KC4HW/Jim" <kc4hw@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 19:47:56 -0500; Hey Dick, thanks for the information. I did read the report, it seems that the CAC did consider the "UNLIMITED" issue. It was unclear whether those changes will be made in the rules. Guess we will ju; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00015.html (7,700 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:39:52 -0500; This is the first time I have read the CAC recommendation regarding the ARRL RTTY RU contest. The key area that needed attention in my opinion was making the "Two off-periods" requirement understanda; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00016.html (9,962 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 07:30:13 -0400 (EDT); Or you could take a 5:30 break after 12 hours (get a good sleep, almost as good as 6 hours) and take one other 30 minute break sometime, maybe to eat something, stretch a bit, say hi to the fam. Mayb; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00018.html (7,587 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:37:21 -0400; Living proof of the misunderstanding! The rule is NO MORE THAN two blocks. Your interpretation after having stated the rule correctly is that a single 6 hour break is not consistent with the rule - i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00023.html (11,379 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:57:11 -0500; Sorry but the "no more than two blocks" is stated in the OLD rule, not the proposed NEW rule. The NEW rule says the operating time will be calculated by subtracting the TWO longest blocks of time fro; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00029.html (12,719 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:42:43 -0400; It's the same basic rule, just stated a different way. Nowhere does it say that you must take two blocks. Only that the sum of the two longest blocks must total 6 hours. One of those longest 2 blocks; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00030.html (13,241 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:30:06 -0800; So if I take a single 7 hour break for sleep and then later a 1 hour break for breakfast or lunch the maximum time I can operate will be 22 hrs? 73, Gary AL9A It's the same basic rule, just stated a; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00031.html (14,867 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 21:37:18 -0400; You can operate longer.....just not in the contest! Seriously - 8 hours off in a 30 hour contest leaves only 22 possible hours to operate. You're allowed 24 operating hours - and the 6 off must be ac; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00032.html (14,823 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 21:01:13 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: I thought we got rid of the New Math. One plus zero equals two? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00034.html (8,314 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 21:41:12 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Like they say, there are 10 kinds of people. Those who understand binary and those who don't. Couldn't resist. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00035.html (8,488 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 00:50:41 -0400; 1+1=2 6+0=6 QED Al AB2ZY ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: I thought we got rid of the New Math. One plus zero equals two? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00037.html (8,855 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 00:58:00 -0500; Bill Isn't Binary that chick that all of those diddle heads used to run around looking for ? Quack ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: Like they say, there are 10 kinds of people. Those who und; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00038.html (9,787 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 00:22:54 -0500; This is still wrong. In your example 6+0=6 you are counting hours. The suggested new rule requires a count of two off times. There is only one off time in 6+0=6. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- Al AB2ZY OR; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00040.html (9,967 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 07:27:04 -0700; Negative. 2 breaks of 3 hours each is fine. 73 Jim W7RY This is still wrong. In your example 6+0=6 you are counting hours. The suggested new rule requires a count of two off times. There is only one; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00042.html (10,646 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:41:37 -0400; Nowhere does it say that you must take two breaks. Only that the off time will be calculated by summing the length of the longest two. If you take one break of 6 hours, the rule is satisfied and ther; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00043.html (11,193 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:58:25 -0400; Most people seem to be quoting the old rules, the new PROPOSED definition, from the ARRL website: 2.1 No entrant may operate more than 24 hours out of the 30-hour contest period. 2.2 Operating Time w; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00044.html (10,313 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:16:46 -0500; Here's my log: 720 QSOs, 1 per minute for 12 hours 0 QSOs, not operating for 6 hours 720 QSOs, 1 per minute for 12 hours My "first QSO" is at 0000z. My "last QSO" is 30 hours later. Please write a fo; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00046.html (12,736 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:34:36 -0400; 30 - (6 + 0) = 24 Here's the pseudo SQL ;^) SELECT OPTIME=(MAX(QSO_TIME) - MIN(QSO_TIME)) FROM QSOs WHERE CALL='K0RC' {build temporary table of off time blocks; left as an exercise for the student) S; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00047.html (13,209 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:08:25 -0500; "You're insisting on reading an interpretation into the rule (that everyone must take a minimum of two breaks with one lasting at least 30 minutes) that has no rational basis given the history and co; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00048.html (17,182 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:14:29 +0100; Interesting thread but why has it taken so long to do what should have been done first; ask the contest management? Rather than debate this, I sent an email asking for confirmation that the rule chan; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00049.html (15,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]