Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+contest\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+contest\s+change\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:18:37 -0800; Maybe the authors of the "proposed" rule to clarify the intent and meaning of the "old" rule need to take a course or two in communicating clearly in the English language. I would suggest they contac; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00050.html (16,903 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 18:33:21 -0700; HI Gary After reading the FD rules for battery operation, I finally decided the only way to be correct is to take the rules to an attorney and let them try to figure them out :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Maybe t; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00053.html (9,469 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:50:14 -0500; Hello John, I have done just that. I exchanged my concerns regarding the new wording of rule 2.2 for the ARRL RTTY RU with Al Dewey, KØAD, the author of the CAC paper.. I also noted that the rule cha; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00057.html (17,939 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 19:46:25 +0100; It's nice that they are talking and trying to fix any ambiguity. I don't think the suggested change works though. It reads: *_New Rule 2.2:_ Operating Time will be calculated using the elapsed time b; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00060.html (18,670 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:45:27 -0700; The rule defines a "break" as being 30 minutes minimum. Therefore in the example below, there is only one "break", the 6-hour period in the middle. The rule wording works fine with the possible excep; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00061.html (10,430 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:13:53 -0700; Why is the ARRL making this so difficult? If they want a period of six hours off, just say so WITHOUT counting the number of breaks. Just say that an official break time must be at least 30 minutes i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00063.html (9,315 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Dan Karg <dkarg@ekarg.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:31:27 -0500; First sane thing I've heard all day here. Dan K0TI -- Dan K0TI _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00064.html (9,866 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:32:10 -0400; It sounds like what they are saying, or at least what some people are interpreting the rules as: If you take a break, you must take 2, and they must be at least 30 minutes long....so what I have done; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00065.html (9,324 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:32:17 -0400; Probably because: 1. IMO RU is supposed to be a "fun" contest (they're all fun, depending on your definition) that allows the more casual contester to be competitive with the "pros" without sleep dep; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00066.html (10,187 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 19:49:49 -0700; Probably because: 1. IMO RU is supposed to be a "fun" contest (they're all fun, 2. It forces some planning of operating strategy. Al AB2ZY How many 'newbies' are on to have fun and how many are 'plan; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00067.html (9,129 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:08:56 -0700; Contest sponsors define the rules for their contest. The ARRL RTTY Round-Up rules stipulate no more than two official breaks. That is intentional to provide a strategic consideration by participants.; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00068.html (10,991 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:23:23 -0500; Bill I don't have any contact with the contest committee , however I suspect the limit of 2 off periods will cut down on Rubber Clocking 30 min breaks. Rex K7QQ Why is the ARRL making this so difficu; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00069.html (9,962 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@twc.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 03:39:14 -0400; "IMO RU is supposed to be a "fun" contest (they're all fun, depending on your definition) that allows the more casual contester to be competitive with the "pros" without sleep deprivation." hmmmmm, i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00070.html (10,133 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:08:35 -0500; Good point Shelby,But I can see how guys would view it that way. Different contest conditions combined with different prop condx gives each contest a personality it's own. I consider the fall CQ RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00071.html (10,778 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]