Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ic756proIII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ic756proIII\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "Robert" <tf3tty@internet.is>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:14:17 -0000; Hi Gang Is it a good idea to get a 756pro III from Icom. can anyone out there tell me if it's a good radio in performance. regards robert TF3TTY _______________________________________________ RTTY m; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00260.html (6,133 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:39:33 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:14:17 -0000, "Robert" <tf3tty@internet.is> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Probably the best RTTY radio ever made unless you want to get into commercial and/or mil; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00273.html (7,101 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "Dean St. Hill" <dsthill@cbcbarbados.bb>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:34:53 -0400; Hi Robert Check our Don's site (AA5AU) - He uses this rig and I believe he likes it a great deal. www.rttycontesting.com Cheers, Dean -- Original Message -- From: "Robert" <tf3tty@internet.is> To: <r; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00276.html (7,934 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:43:43 -0500; Thanks Dean. More specifically, the link is: http://www.rttycontesting.com/icom756proiii/icom_ic756proiii_index.htm Yes, I like this radio very much. It's the best radio I've ever operated. I've not; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00277.html (8,515 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "Dean St. Hill" <dsthill@cbcbarbados.bb>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:50:14 -0400; Hi Don and other RTTYers I'm still convinced you're missing out by not having an FT1000mpMK5 or field. Admittedly I haven't used a ProIII but have used the original Pro and the ProII and wasn't as ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00280.html (10,183 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "Jay Bromley" <jayw5jay@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:10:38 -0500; Hi Dean and RTTY gang, I had a Mark V Field with over $1200 of Inrad filtering ( including the roofing filter ) and it is no match against the Pro III on RTTY. The only thing I missed going to the Pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00293.html (12,318 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "dsthill" <dsthill@cbcbarbados.bb>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:58:06 -0400; Interesting points Jay. You're right about the Inrad filters of course. I've spent a small fortune on those along with the roofing filter. I am suspecting both from your comments and those of Don, th; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00314.html (14,628 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: "Jay Bromley" <jayw5jay@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:44:30 -0500; Hi Dean, Don't get me wrong, the Inraded Mark V is a good radio. Like you I spent a ton of time and money on it. Yes you are very correct on Icom's double peak filter, it is dynamite. The trick to ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00329.html (19,225 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] ic756proIII (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:59:35 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The bandscope is also excellent for finding when a band is open in the first place, especially at this low point of the solar cycle. Just go to ten meters and wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00349.html (8,132 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]