Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+interface\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] interface (score: 1): Author: WD5DBV@cs.com (WD5DBV@cs.com); Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:58:10 EDT; --part1_51.133b9c93.290ab7e2_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I will be replacing my pk 232 with a newer unit I am looking at the Hal DXP-38 and K; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00365.html (7,659 bytes)
2. [RTTY] interface (score: 1): Author: mobile.workshop@guernseytelecoms.com (Mobile Workshop); Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:20:40 +0100; Hi Roy! You don't say what type of radio or PC you have, but have you considered using MMTTY via the soundcard? This is a very good piece of software, and does away with the need for a seperate TU. W; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00366.html (7,923 bytes)
3. [RTTY] interface (score: 1): Author: kchen@apple.com (Kok Chen); Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:10:33 -0700; WD5DBV asked: Hi Roy, The modems that I currently have are a modified KAM Plus, a KAM 98, a HAL DSP-4100 and a Timewave DSP-599zx. In terms of ability to decode signals, for my use, I would rate them; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00367.html (7,801 bytes)
4. [RTTY] interface (score: 1): Author: w5ben@arrl.net (Duane Budd); Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:53:42 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0004_01C15E2E.011D79A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Don't fool around! Get an SCS PTC; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00368.html (9,660 bytes)
5. [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:35:53 -0500; My MFJ-1275 interface went bad this week. I am looking at replacing it with either a Signal Link or a Rigblaster plus. Any concerns on either from anyone? Darl NA8W __________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00023.html (6,744 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:51:34 -0700; I have had great luck with the Microham products. I have an MK2R+ and a Microkeyer II. Both work great for RTTY. I have some rigblaster products and prefer the MicroHam products. "A slip of the foot; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00025.html (7,323 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: Roberto <ea2ry@ea2ry.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:43:53 +0100; MicroKeyer II is my best option. Roberto - EA2RY http://www.ea2ry.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00034.html (7,506 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:18:53 -0500; I only know about the SignaLink USB (have it and like it) and though it is an exceptional unit for what it does do, it does not support FSK. So if you are really into RTTY and want FSK, then the Sign; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00039.html (8,394 bytes)
9. [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "Ken Bills" <kbills@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:14:56 -0500; Many good suggestions. I use a US Interface Navigator. It supports FSK and has WinKey included in the interface. Ken-W9KB _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00046.html (6,379 bytes)
10. [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "Jay" <n1fdx@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:59:23 -0400; I use a Signalink USB by Tigertronics, Works Great. Jay N1FDX _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00062.html (6,073 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:19:21 -0700; Hi Jay That runs AFSK only, doesn't it? don't think it does FSK if I'm not mistaken. 73 Tom W7WHY I use a Signalink USB by Tigertronics, Works Great. Jay N1FDX _______________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00065.html (7,294 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:58:14 -0600; Correct. Nice little unit but I prefer FSK. I bought one to run some psk and other modes while mobile. Mike W0MU J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011 CQ WW DX CW W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net _________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00068.html (8,090 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:22:34 -0400; Correct. Signalink USB is a basic <$20 USB sound card ("headset adapter") with a VOX circuit added for PTT. It contains no serial interface for rig control, FSK, CW or PTT. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00069.html (8,212 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:53:23 -0700; One of these interface manufacturers may wise up one day and include something like K4DSP's FSKit Atmel chip (ATTiny45, $2.20 in unit quantities at Digikey) into their boxes. It will immediately open; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00071.html (7,832 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:03:03 -0400; I purchased a SignaLink USB and it worked (and still works) great. I now use a custom built FSK interface so I can take advantage of the tight filters on my radio needed when in a RTTY contest. For c; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00072.html (9,564 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: Jurgen Geldhof <list@on5mf.be>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:58:23 +0200; My setup is like this since a few days: - All AFSK modes: TX and RX via Signalink USB - RTTY: TX FSK via transistor/resistor circuit on RS232 and RX via Signalink USB TRX is FT990 (for now). I used A; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00077.html (10,597 bytes)
17. [RTTY] interface (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:50:44 -0500; I think my 10 year old RigBlaster Plus interface has failed and I am looking at a replacement There is a RigBlaster II+ available. I also have looked at the specs for the SignaLink TIG-SL-USB that ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00120.html (7,825 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] interface (score: 1): Author: Stu Ritter <Stu@mercedeslist.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:22:54 -0600; I'd suggest taking a look at http://www.melvin2.freeserve.co.uk/new-page-3.htm Johnny Melvin builds a really fine interface that works flawlessly and comes set up for your rig. I have one of his Iso; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00122.html (8,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]