Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+poor\s+signals\s+and\s+soundcards\s+performance\/calibration\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] poor signals and soundcards performance/calibration (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:30:47 +0200
But I also confirm what Phil has mentionned here For the processing power, I don't know, but for the soundcard I am sure! -A good soundcard with low noise line input (like you can find on "home studi
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00260.html (8,307 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] poor signals and soundcards performance/calibration (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:29:38 -0000
To the best of my knowledge(PTC-II handbook), the PTC-II does NOT use analog filters for RTTY/AMTOR/Pactor. 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de -- Original Message -- From: <f6irf@free.fr> To: <rtty@contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00263.html (9,458 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] poor signals and soundcards performance/calibration (score: 1)
Author: f6irf@free.fr
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:10:06 +0200
Hi Goetz Yes, you are probably right... by the way I only saw the PTC2 but never used it. I was thinking about the SCS pactor1(*) modem, which we have used for a couple of years here at QRL (92-99),
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00290.html (7,491 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu