- 1. [RTTY] rig recomendations (score: 1)
- Author: lratcliff@isp.com
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:14:42 -0400 (EDT)
- I am looking at a Kenwood TS-930Sat. Anyone have any comments, good or bad on this radio? I cant find anything bad about them, other than some issues with the early serial number units. Lee Ratcliff
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00233.html (7,285 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] rig recomendations (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:42:30 -0500
- The 930 has no computer interface, which becomes an issue if you want to use control software, such as logging programs. That's the primary reason that I replaced my 930 with a TS-850 15 years ago. I
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00234.html (8,024 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] rig recomendations (score: 1)
- Author: "Jack West XP" <w7ld@theriver.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:04:50 -0700
- Lee, I bought a Kenwood TS-940Sat brand new, with all the goodies and filters in 1988. That radio has earned 32 1st place certs in CW and RTTY contesting. I think that is pretty amazing service to sa
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00235.html (9,148 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] rig recomendations (score: 1)
- Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:46:18 -0400
- I agree with Jack. This was a good radio, but time is time - everything and everybody are getting old and tired... Capacitots are drying out - the most common issue in all oldies... If you like kenwo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00237.html (10,682 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] rig recomendations (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:07:40 -0700
- I agree with Andrei. I have owned both the '850 and '870 and they are both great RTTY radios. I would give the edge to the '870 due to its built-in digital filters, but either one will do a great job
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00244.html (8,016 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu