Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+single\s+op\,\s+1\s+radio\,\s+2\s+recvrs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+single\s+op\,\s+1\s+radio\,\s+2\s+recvrs\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:50:33 -0500; Just to stir the pot a bit. (please don't use the 'level playing field' nonsense) I hope to run my new SDR5Ka this weekend (Writelog dual contest mode). But my question for debate is: I will soon get; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00183.html (7,181 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:22:22 -0700; Since the single receiver on the Flex-5000 is fully duplex with the transmitter, it means that you can already be simultaneously listening on one band while transmitting on another. You are almost fu; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00184.html (7,584 bytes)
3. [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:34:28 -0500; Sure, I'll grab the ladle and give it a coupla turns... (you knew I would, didn't you?) I think the SO2R (Single Operator Two Radio) moniker is a misnomer. I have 6 radios that I can "turn on" and us; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00186.html (8,777 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:46:51 -0400; Bob, You know I can't let this pass. SO2R means exactly what it says ... its history goes all the way back to guys that had multiple radios (and amplifiers) tuned up are ready to go on several bands.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00199.html (11,394 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:47:54 -0400; Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: "You know I can't let this pass." Me neither...................NOT :>)))))))))))))))))))))) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing li; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00201.html (6,864 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:30:04 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Agreed, nobody should be penalized for using a second radio to listen while transmitting, whether on the same band or a different band or all bands at once. Good; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00256.html (7,848 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:10:45 -0400; You are constantly repeating this refrain - it is still as intellectually and ethically bankrupt as the first day you wrote it. To separate operators into entry classes based on the efficiency of th; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00259.html (10,468 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: scarroll@mchsi.com; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:00:43 +0000; Yikes, it's really hard NOT to enter into this discussion. I've been biting my tongue for so long there's nothing left !!! It seems to me that by having an EXPERT Class in a contest that would classi; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00267.html (9,196 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:58:01 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Technique is part of it, but the main difference is hardware. The second radio, remember? When hardware gives a marked advantage, such as adding an amplifier or; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00272.html (7,923 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Jim McDonald <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:24:03 -0700; Are duels still legal? ;-) Jim N7US -- Original Message -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Technique is part of it, but the main difference is hardware. The second radio, remember? When hardwar; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00275.html (7,715 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:50:50 -0500; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00277.html (8,616 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:00:06 -0400; When you propose, promote and demand separate categories for antennas taller than 50 feet and with elements totaling more than 1/2 wave with the same vigor that you have used on your jihad against S; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00280.html (9,865 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:08:24 -0400; One pistol or two pistol? Michael Keane K1MK k1mk@alum.mit.edu _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00281.html (7,731 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:19:46 -0700; What's the difference? We are told that it is the skill of the shooter that matters :-) :-) 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00283.html (7,457 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Jack West XP" <w7ld@theriver.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:05:38 -0700; ANYONE? I wonder if there is an age limit for learning this skill? How many hours of practicing are required on an average? I tried a bit of SO2R and found it to be quite confusing over SO1R. 73 de J; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00288.html (8,550 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:49:55 -0700; Hi Steve Sounds like a good idea, but who decides who is an expert and who isn't? I kinda like the Unlimited class in the SS (won it last year). Maybe something like that would work. Seems to me that; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00289.html (7,927 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:47:52 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- LOL! Made my day. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00291.html (7,719 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:02:37 -0700; So, using stacked Yagis is "SO2A" and should be yet another entry class? My personal experience with SO2R is that successfully deploying it is 90% skill, not just simply connecting in a second radio; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00292.html (9,322 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:16:22 -0400; Ed, you hit on the most amazing thing. The main objectors to SO2R not being in a different category have never tried it. If they had, I think the objections would stop. John, WA9ALS _________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00293.html (10,090 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:32:06 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Welcome to the discussion, Ed. It has long been agreed that two-radio operation is a marked advantage over one-radio. The best two-radio expert of all (arguably); /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00294.html (9,198 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]