Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+thats\s+very\s+sad\s+Gert\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+thats\s+very\s+sad\s+Gert\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:27:12 -0600; I had a similar experience. I had sent a sase for a band/mode I needed to a League official. After no return I emailed him asking (politely), if he had gotten my request. His reply...."...way too bus; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00556.html (7,612 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:31:36 -0500; Bill, If they're in my division and they're too busy to respond to my request for a QSL, they're too busy to represent me. I'll vote against them the next time. The non-QSLers should be posted somewh; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00559.html (8,860 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:04:51 -0600; First I do want to point out that my term 'league official' does not necessarily mean a division 'director or 'vice-director'. I was trying to be non-specific. I don't want anyone to think I meant ol; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00561.html (8,803 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "Terry Gerdes" <terry@ab5k.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:41:10 -0600; Hi all, I find it very alarming that 66 percent of out ARRL officials do not use LOTW. Even the ARRL Chief Technology Officer: Paul Rinaldo, W4RI is not a LOTW user. Are these folks no longer hams? A; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00564.html (12,848 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:48:57 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There's a certain WA2 who wouldn't QSL my SASE because I was "too late" sending it to him - six months or something, although he sp; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00565.html (8,024 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:06:16 -0600; That's the funny part Bill, if the guy who blew me off computed the time involved in reading his mail, and then responding to my email request that he return my sase/qsl, he probably would have darn; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00567.html (9,736 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: George K3GP <k3gp@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:15:16 -0500; Seems to me that the only time a QSL is "too late" is when the recipient has become a silent key. And then, you wouldn't get a "too late" response unless it was from the bereaved family. Personally,; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00568.html (8,615 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:36:33 -0500; It is also relatively easy to see when a particular station last uploaded logs from the LotW "home page" ... Terry's work is nice and I hope it causes some people (both League Officials and members); /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00570.html (10,474 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:50:00 -0800 (PST); "That's the funny part Bill, if the guy who blew me off computed the time involved in reading his mail, and then responding to my email request that he return my sase/qsl, he probably would have darn; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00571.html (8,113 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:53:00 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You are right of course. It's a character defect I seem to have. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00573.html (8,247 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:54:03 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You are right of course. It's a character defect I seem to have. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00574.html (8,050 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:58:43 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You're absolutely right. The only time I send the B4 message is when the same guy tries to dupe me for the third time in five minut; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00575.html (8,702 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: w2nra@optonline.net; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:27:35 -0500; Gee and that WA2 is very active in RTTY contesting. I just calculated the time it takes me to upload LotW including exporting from contest program, inport to logging program and upload to LotW. Star; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00576.html (8,501 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: w2nra@optonline.net; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:28:56 -0500; With LotW users it's never too late. [snip] Yes! Very Interesting. . . . . .But Dumb! 73 Arte W2NRA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00577.html (8,222 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:48:45 -0600; You're confusing two groups of individuals. ARRL members vote for Section Managers and Division Directors and Vice-Directors. The Board of Directors then decides who will be President/VP, etc (much l; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00588.html (9,138 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:19:06 -0800 (PST); "Nonetheless, it is interesting to see how many do not participate. I think identifying members of the DX- and Contest Advisory Committees who don't participate (or who aren't good QSLers) would be m; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00589.html (9,157 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "Scott Schultz" <scottaschultz@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:40:03 -0600; There is one more person who won't be using LoTW, Sarah Dorsey. Remember her? I didn't think so. On October 5, 2005, she became the first Membership Director of the ARRL after 91 years. She, like Mar; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00590.html (9,608 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:23:51 -0800 (PST); To use or Not to use the LOTW: this is a choice, Nobody is obligated to use LOTW. You do Not have to use LOTW. I personnaly do not like LOTW (hate it), so what? I am still a Ham Radio lover. LOTW (fo; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00591.html (10,866 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:45:35 -0600; Before we get too far off track and ramp up the "League bashing"... what's the point if 66% of the officers don't use LOTW? You don't have all the facts. Of those 66%, what percent are on the air? If; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00593.html (10,313 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:45:43 -0800; I remember a certain ZL station that used to stamp cards that included just a greenstamp "Dollar bills don't pay for DX'peditions" and send your own card back. 73 Tom W7WHY __________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00597.html (9,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]