Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+zw0s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+zw0s\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: ws7i at ieway.com (Jay); Date: Wed Apr 9 20:07:30 2003; QRV now 0007Z 14.089 up 1 to 4 ________________________________________________________________ Sent via the KillerWebMail system at mail.ieway.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-04/msg00060.html (6,076 bytes)
2. [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: "Charles/kk5oq" <kk5oq@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:06:32 +0100; 14082.00 st. peter and paul rocks 2300z gl charles/kk5oq _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00019.html (5,982 bytes)
3. RE: [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:28:31 -0500; Sure would be nice to work ZW0S on 30 meter RTTY. There hasn't been much CW activity on 30 meters from the rocks, so many of use could use a new band/mode there. Perhaps someone in touch with the op; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00020.html (7,428 bytes)
4. RE: [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: Jay Townsend <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:48:30 +0000; I would think that RTTY on 20 is much more important than CW on 30 meters. Glad to see him there, and there are still quite a few that need it on RTTY. In fact my XYL, WV7Y just worked him a couple o; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00021.html (6,953 bytes)
5. RE: [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 23:18:54 -0400; At 10:28 PM 9/2/2003, Nelson Moyer wrote: Sure would be nice to work ZW0S on 30 meter RTTY. There hasn't been much CW activity on 30 meters from the rocks, so many of use could use a new band/mode th; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00023.html (7,778 bytes)
6. RE: [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:21:41 -0500; Hi Jay, I think you missed the point. I was suggesting running RTTY on 30 meters, not CW. He dosen't operate CW! By running RTTY on 30 meters it gives a chance at a new band and mode at the same time; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00024.html (8,206 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:24:07 -0700; It was nice to receive QSL cards from Joaquin for RTTY Qs in April 13, 20M, and April18, 40M RTTY. Received cards direct from PS7JN on Aug 21, 2003. I believe many more stations need it on RTTY and n; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00025.html (8,180 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] zw0s (score: 1): Author: "Charles/kk5oq" <kk5oq@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:18:51 +0100; Steve, congrats..i'll take a gazillion contest points in return!! 73 charles/kk5oq -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Moore AI9T" <sjmmoore@verizon.net> To: "Charles/kk5oq" <kk5oq@bellsouth.net> Sen; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00030.html (8,100 bytes)
9. [RTTY] ZW0S (score: 1): Author: K4FJ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:23:57 EST; Anyone received a QSL from the 9/2003 ZW0S operation? Secondly, any indication that the logs will be uploaded to LOTW? 73, Steve _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00021.html (6,385 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] ZW0S (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:29:29 -0600; Yes I did, and they were just recently accepted by DXCC desk But no LoTW as yet. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00022.html (6,984 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]