Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SD\-User\]\s+Changed\s+behaviour\s+in\s+ESM\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SD\-User\]\s+Changed\s+behaviour\s+in\s+ESM\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Alex GM3ZBE <alex@gm3zbe.plus.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:19:52 +0000; Paul, I am running V 15.33. In the arrl dx cw test I noticed that when in ESM mode S+P, if I entered a callsign in the call field and pressed enter, my callsign was sent and the cursor moved to the s; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00019.html (7,644 bytes)
2. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:33 +0000; I've checked it here, and it seems to be working as expected (as described above). I've not changed any ESM code in a long time. Can anyone else comment? 73, Paul EI5DI ______________________________; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00020.html (7,524 bytes)
3. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Alex GM3ZBE <alex@gm3zbe.plus.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:40:46 +0000; OK Paul, I will check it thoroughly here and report back. Ta Alex -- 73 Alex, GM3ZBE ~~~ Kingdom of Fife ~~~ IO86lf ~ Member of: De Montfort University ARS, Kingdom Amateur Radio Society (KARS) GMDX; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00021.html (7,943 bytes)
4. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Alex GM3ZBE <alex@gm3zbe.plus.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:25:08 +0000; Paul, Typical !.... I can't reproduce it now. For what it's worth I am using SD with Windows XP Home. Probably something I did in the contest to mess it up. Should it occur again I will let you know.; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00022.html (8,374 bytes)
5. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Bob Bagwell <bob.g4hzv@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:21:20 +0000; I use ESM in S&P mode a lot and I see no change in V15.33. 73 Bob _______________________________________________ SD-User mailing list SD-User@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00023.html (8,371 bytes)
6. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:37:13 -0600; For what it's worth, I found that I could coerce some VERY strange behavior out of SD when I would occasionally start flailing around the keyboard when an exchange didn't go as expected (I don't do w; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00024.html (9,721 bytes)
7. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Harris" <mike.harris@cwimail.fk>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:27:10 -0300; The call entered wasn't one already worked on another band by chance. In this case the state would already pre entered in the state field and ESM primed to send the report not "Mycall" after the firs; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00025.html (9,490 bytes)
8. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:32:02 -0600; The AUTOFILL command is supposed to toggle that behavior on and off: When SD identifies district codes from the callsign, or from previous QSOs, it auto-fills the data in the exchange field. This may; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00026.html (10,406 bytes)
9. Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? (score: 1): Author: Alex GM3ZBE <alex@gm3zbe.plus.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:19:08 +0000; Hi Paul et al, I did some further checking and Mike and Bert are correct. If the state/prov info is pre-filled then the behaviour is as I described, i.e. the report is sent instead of MYCALL being se; /archives//html/SD-User/2011-02/msg00027.html (10,793 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]