- 1. [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk (Richard W L Limebear)
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:09:12 GMT
- Greetings Does anyone have the setup for last year's RSGB Club Calls Contest please ? This year's would be even better. 73 Richard W L Limebear G3RWL g3rwl@amsat.org FOC # 1188 ______________________
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00000.html (6,031 bytes)
- 2. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 19:52:21 -0000
- Very sorry, but this is the one RSGB contest that SD does not support - simply because the club names must be recorded in full - for example "Loughton and Epping Forest Amateur Radio Society". SD per
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00001.html (6,853 bytes)
- 3. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Sergeant" <dsergeant@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 21:13:50 -0000
- I had a similar problem using SD in the Yeovil Fun Run contest (a GQRP contest), where the exchange consists of power plus name. To cater for those who sent long names I kept a pad of paper to the si
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00003.html (8,186 bytes)
- 4. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk (Richard W L Limebear)
- Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 01:24:19 GMT
- I'm amazed that a longer field length is not possible. Yes, see RSGB HFCC website - includes examples for CCC in Cabrillo format. I logged call/serial and outputted in cabrillo, then added the rest
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00004.html (8,742 bytes)
- 5. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:57:03 -0000
- It is possible, but it introduces QSO capacity issues and various other compromises. There are some inconsistencies in the example shown. 1. The indicated length for received club names is 26 charac
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00005.html (7,915 bytes)
- 6. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:41:14 +0000
- Richard W L Limebear wrote: Agreed abbreviation codes could certainly be allocated to each Affiliated Society just for the purpose of this contest. It would at least be easier if one could write "ARS
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00006.html (8,757 bytes)
- 7. RE: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Andy Hewitt" <andyphewitt@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:40:03 -0000
- Surely the best solution is to give each club a registration number or code (like district codes in other contests) of just two or three characters, unless the object is to copy long club names corre
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00007.html (9,632 bytes)
- 8. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Farmer" <G3VAO@hortonbrook.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:45:22 -0000
- Why not use the Clubs RSGB membership number which if memory serves me correctly is on the RadCom address label. Then you have no need for yet another list!! Maybe its my turn to half joke but the RS
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00008.html (10,845 bytes)
- 9. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: Richard@g3rwl.demon.co.uk (Richard W L Limebear)
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:42:59 GMT
- If its just related to memory size (how many people only have just 600k of spare memory ?) I wouldn't think of it as an issue. Nor do I see any need for this field to be checked against other fields.
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00009.html (10,125 bytes)
- 10. Re: [SD-User] Club Calls setup ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Howland" <paul.howland1@virgin.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:56:49 -0000
- Pain in the neck. Last time we did it I spent Hours on the Internet and in my call book getting it +/- correct. Perhaps the RSGB should do it as a word search (or perhaps an accompanying one) !!!!! G
- /archives//html/SD-User/2003-11/msg00010.html (11,810 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu