Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SD\-User\]\s+Re\:\s+DOS\s+versions\s+discontinued\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SD\-User\]\s+Re\:\s+DOS\s+versions\s+discontinued\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SD-User] Re: DOS versions discontinued (score: 1): Author: "Martin Davies G0HDB" <g0hdb@amdavies.demon.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:31:55 +0100; Nooooo, please don't do this, Paul!! I'm sure I'm not the only one who would prefer to see the SD family available as DOS programs capable of running on virtually any type of PC rather than needing; /archives//html/SD-User/2004-04/msg00013.html (8,835 bytes)
2. Re: [SD-User] Re: DOS versions discontinued (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:12:33 +0100; The only thing I can do is to repeat what I've already said. I do not have time to maintain two separate sets of programs. DOS is a legacy operating system. I recognise its advantages for contest log; /archives//html/SD-User/2004-04/msg00014.html (8,522 bytes)
3. Re: [SD-User] Re: DOS versions discontinued (score: 1): Author: Neill Taylor <ntaylor@breathemail.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 22:39:17 +0100; I would like to strongly support Paul in his policy of moving forward with SD development. I quite understand how users of old equipment with a legacy operating system might feel - but I'm sure that; /archives//html/SD-User/2004-04/msg00018.html (8,658 bytes)
4. [SD-User] Re: DOS versions discontinued (score: 1): Author: "Martin Davies G0HDB" <g0hdb@amdavies.demon.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:56:12 +0100; All fully understood, Paul. As others have already said you've done well to keep the two variants going this far! Again all understood - it sort of exposes the shortcomings of Windows for relatively; /archives//html/SD-User/2004-04/msg00027.html (9,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]