- 1. [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: elin recke <oz7easter@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:10:53 +0100
- My log cq-ww-cw is not accepted using V.1523. Robot reply: Your submission does not appear to be in the required Cabrillo format. Old style electronic summary sheets and log files no longer meet the
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00010.html (6,560 bytes)
- 2. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:39:42 +0000
- . Old style electronic summary sheets and log files no longer meet the The robot is saying that you did not send a Cabrillo Log. I sumbitted mine during the week, and it was accepted. Please try agai
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00011.html (7,350 bytes)
- 3. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: "Derek Thom" <g3nks@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:30:23 -0800
- I had the same problem as OE7EA, but in my case upgrading from V15.19 (I think) to the latest version of SD and re-running SDCHECK did the trick. But having just read Steve G0AEV's comments it may be
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00013.html (8,374 bytes)
- 4. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: "Derek Thom" <g3nks@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:32:47 -0800
- In my earlier email the last sentence should have read: But having just read Steve G0AEV's comments it may be that the problem was NOT with what I had done/not-done.. 73, Derek G3NKS ________________
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00014.html (9,300 bytes)
- 5. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:03:16 +0000
- Elin, If the robot still doesn't accept your log, please send it to me and I will fix it or let you know exactly what has to be done. 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ SD
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00015.html (7,154 bytes)
- 6. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: "Val" <val@vip.bg>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:08:00 +0200
- Paul, It seems that the robot no more accepts one row category entries, produced by SD Check like that: CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP 20M QRP Now he wants separate rows: CATEGORY-OPERATOR: SINGLE-OP CATEGORY-B
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00019.html (8,544 bytes)
- 7. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:37:28 -0800
- It accepted mine without problems: CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP 15M QRP (admittedly using v14.26) 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com _______________________________________________ SD-User mailing list
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00020.html (8,091 bytes)
- 8. Re: [SD-User] cq-ww-cw log OZ7EA (score: 1)
- Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:19:13 +0000
- No, the robot converts multiple fields in the CATEGORY tag to separate, single-field, categories. More specifically, the robot converts Cabrillo V2 headers (from SDCHECK logs) to the more recent Cabr
- /archives//html/SD-User/2010-12/msg00021.html (7,858 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu