Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+Building\s+Permits\s+for\s+Tower\s+Bases\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+Building\s+Permits\s+for\s+Tower\s+Bases\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 1): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:29:48 -0400; Dave, yeah. I was taking this into consideration. Unless I win the lottery, my biggest rotatable antenna on the tower will be a 2-ele Quad on a 12' boom. If I do win the lottery, I'll just move to so; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00151.html (7,899 bytes)
2. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:45:47 -0400; You may also want to consider the FCC's RF exposure guidelines. I don't recall all the intricacies, but at 16', I would think that would preclude ever using legal limit. If your lot is bigger and you; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00152.html (7,734 bytes)
3. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 1): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:29:35 -0400; True. I could put the center of the tower smack dab in the center of the back yard where my HF2V is currently. The YL will not like it there but I probably would not have any set-back issues nor boom; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00154.html (8,543 bytes)
4. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:31:05 -0500; Put it in the middle of the yard. If the XYL don't like it, tell her what you said here for your reasoning. If she don't like it....well.....get over it. I personally do NOT comprehend why anyone doi; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00156.html (9,776 bytes)
5. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:04:47 -0400; Good choice. The best reason for going through all the hassle is that you will have less liability to worry about as your homeowner's insurance will likely cover it. If you just put it up without the; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00157.html (8,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]