Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+K4GA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+K4GA\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:56:33 +0000; -- I would say the probability of that is well above 99%. BUT, it would be a very long shot with the FCC vanity process as they now apply it. The only way for the call to be reissued within the 2 ye; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00044.html (8,630 bytes)
2. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 1): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:10:56 -0400; Thanks. That is perhaps the most frank discussion on the call vanity system I've ever read! After having lived in northern Virginia for 35 years, it certainly rings a bell! Tommy W4BQF --Original Mes; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00046.html (9,303 bytes)
3. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:25:57 -0500; Man there is an understatement if I ever heard one. The FCC and the ARRL are corrupt. Believe me folks it ain't just in callsign stuff either. How about RH pulling people out of the database with NO; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00049.html (10,522 bytes)
4. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:07:49 -0700 (PDT); You are not alone in those feelings... Gary - WB4SQ __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.ya; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00053.html (11,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]