Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+PFFT\!\s+\(Was\:\s+Texas\s+QSO\s+Party\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:23:33 -0400
Can't handle poor attempts at sarcastic humor Tommy? I still don't understand why certain states schedule their QSO parties at the same time as major international contests. -- JT Croteau - W6FO - Ca
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00091.html (6,964 bytes)

2. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e at bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:04:13 -0400
Because the people that run those QSO Parties are not really contesters....
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00093.html (7,904 bytes)

3. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:22:04 -0500
I think you have answered that age old question Jeff. I know when Jim (KC4HW) and I was looking to change the Alabama QSO Party weekend we spent a LOT of time checking who was doing what and when. An
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00094.html (8,940 bytes)

4. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e at bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:15:37 -0400
JT, The Texas QSO Party has been around for awhile and is probably in the top 5 of State QSO Parties. From 1983 through 1985, TDXS (sponsor of the TQP) sponsored the 'Armadillo Runs' which, over thre
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00095.html (7,121 bytes)

5. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:06:08 -0400
Then someone needs to tell the ops because they sure act like it. If it has rules and awards, it's a contest IMO. -- JT Croteau - W6FO - Canton, GA ARS #2,147 | NoGA-QRP | SEDXC | SECC | ARRL
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00101.html (7,052 bytes)

6. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:30:02 -0400
What we need in this world are more weekends. I vote we make Tuesday and Wednesday weekends as well.... Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will m
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00104.html (7,092 bytes)

7. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:36:30 -0400
Last I looked, RTTY was authorized in the US from 7000-7150 kHz. CW is from 7000-7300 kHz. In Regions 1 and 3, the entire 40m band is only 7000-7100. 7040 kHz is the International RTTY calling freque
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00105.html (7,756 bytes)

8. [SECC] [SEDXC] PFFT! (Was: Texas QSO Party) (score: 1)
Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:49:53 -0500
Well Bill, and I'm NOT trying to antagonize you....but.....Just because it is authorized via a ARRL band plan that apparantly recieved FCC blessings, DOES NOT mean it is the right thing to do. I thin
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00106.html (8,843 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu