Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+160\s+band\s+plan\s+comments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+160\s+band\s+plan\s+comments\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:56:30 -0500; Any band plan for 160 BEFORE the band is a worldwide band (at least 1800 to 1900 portion) will not work. Much of the world is limited to 1830 to 1850 so trying to place CW and SSB segments will not a; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00062.html (8,332 bytes)
2. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:09:00 -0500; Well, more like 1810-1850. Most nations with 160m allocations include this 40 kHz. Well, it COULD work, but you'd have to draw the line about 1830 - lower is CW and digital, higher is SSB. But that d; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00067.html (9,330 bytes)
3. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:38:41 -0500; Splits on forty is just fine. SSB would be unworkable without it. And many stations on work splits on CW. Check out what happens during large pileups. Ask Joe when he gets back. Vic AD8K -- SECC on t; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00068.html (7,364 bytes)
4. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:46:19 -0500; Thanks for the comments. The ARRL has set up a committee to come up with a band plan for 160. My main statement is that the band must first be a world wide band. Outside major contest weekends the ex; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00069.html (8,105 bytes)
5. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:13:08 -0500; Think of splits as lid control. Simplex is horrible these days. The lids call even when they can't hear the DX. Vic AD8K -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.c; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00070.html (7,527 bytes)
6. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:41:07 -0500; Splits are not common during contests, other than 160m CW for JA (not any more), 80m SSB DX, and 40 SSB DX. And nothing is more frustrating than to be working 40m in a DX contest and hear all the DX; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00072.html (7,824 bytes)
7. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:22:37 -0500; Well, in a contest, it could be that the DX just doesn't expect to work US stations at that particular time -- so if there is an unexpected opening on 40m, it will be missed. If you look at the resul; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00080.html (9,203 bytes)
8. [SECC] 160 band plan comments (score: 1): Author: victor@brecnet.com (Victor Blackwell); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:08:21 -0500; Hey, maybe you are right. I noticed you mentioned SSB. Sorry don't know a thing about it on 160. Just keep it out of the window so we can work split on CW. Vic AD8K -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.c; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00081.html (7,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]