Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+10\s+M\s+test\s+and\s+Croatian\s+CW\s+DX\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+10\s+M\s+test\s+and\s+Croatian\s+CW\s+DX\s+Contest\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] ARRL 10 M test and Croatian CW DX Contest (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:30:49 -0500; Hello all: In a conversation this morning, one of the top European contest enthusiasts, Gedas, LY3BA (contest call LY9A), told me he was undecided which contest to work this weekend. Since the ARRL s; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00111.html (9,310 bytes)
2. [SECC] ARRL 10 M test and Croatian CW DX Contest (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:51:14 +0000; I agree with John in giving out the serial numbers if asked, but I will not log such a contact. If I get called later by the same person, operating the 10 meter contest, that's OK. But I'm not willin; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00114.html (8,983 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL 10 M test and Croatian CW DX Contest (score: 1): Author: k4ab@msn.com (Larry Crim); Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:21:32 -0600; --=_NextPart_001_0000_01C18270.A8FBB220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Ed, You DON'T get penalized for logging dupes. If you use any of the major logging programs, they will mark them; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00116.html (14,480 bytes)
4. [SECC] ARRL 10 M test and Croatian CW DX Contest (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:35:52 -0500; Ed: There is no penalty for dupes in electronic logs. There is absolutely no downside to logging dupe contacts. There is certainly no reason not to log a station who gives you a serial number and you; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00118.html (7,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]