Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+160\s+tomorrow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+ARRL\s+160\s+tomorrow\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:30:33 -0500; ONE MORE DAY until the great SECC club effort in the ARRL 160 ontest! Conditions have been getting better steadily over the past few days -- DXers have been working some great stuff like XU and 5W, a; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00026.html (7,789 bytes)
2. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: mcondon@attglobal.net (Michael Condon); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:39:38 -0500; It appears we are hosting relatives for supper tomorrow, so I will get a late start. But I will be in there after about 10PM on. Hope the conditions do remain favorable. CU there, Mike, NE4S ONE MORE; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00027.html (8,946 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:24:57 -0500 (EST); W2GD sent me a message and warned me that they would be multi-op from a new QTH. He says it is in a salt water swamp area and they have high hopes of doing big things this year. Since they were not Q; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00028.html (7,823 bytes)
4. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: SteveWS4F@aol.com (SteveWS4F@aol.com); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:42:05 EST; << ONE MORE DAY until the great SECC club effort in the ARRL 160 ontest! Conditions have been getting better steadily over the past few days -- DXers have been working some great stuff like XU and 5W; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00029.html (8,622 bytes)
5. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:42:57 -0500; Let's hope so. Any of you really experienced 160m ops have any tips on maximizing your 160m contest scores? Especially for wimpy stations who may not hear that well? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00030.html (8,299 bytes)
6. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 16:43:04 -0500; Bring 'em on!!!! Jay, K4OGG -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00031.html (7,938 bytes)
7. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: rvhoeft@intergraph.com (Hoeft, Roger V); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:05:40 -0600; Gary, I'm in. I took the opportunity of a sick kid (not that sick thankfully :^) ) to get the inverted L and elevated radials up yesterday. No Rx antennas, maybe hang the 160M dipole low to the groun; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00032.html (8,797 bytes)
8. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:14:57 -0500; We are still on for the M/S though I have yet to hear back from AA4NN. The new vertical appears to be working well as I was copied by the XU7 this morning on 160 and have been easily working whatever; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00033.html (8,013 bytes)
9. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:15:58 -0500; -- your that -- Simple, Bill -- Assume that everyone you hear can also hear you, even the weakest stations. Act like you are QRO with big antennas. That's the key to all successful QRP or antenna-lim; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00034.html (8,350 bytes)
10. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:31:30 -0500 (EST); Call CQ 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00036.html (9,008 bytes)
11. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: dxcc@dbtech.net (Allan & Bridget); Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:27:19 -0600; <<Simple, Bill -- Assume that everyone you hear can also hear you, even the weakest stations. Act like you are QRO with big antennas. That's the key to all successful QRP or antenna-limited contestin; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00037.html (8,975 bytes)
12. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:50:49 -0500; It is much appreciated! The bandplan states CW from 1.800-2.000. Naturally, any station, any where should avoid causing interference with other stations, especially stations on other modes. Watch for; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00039.html (8,057 bytes)
13. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 15:20:52 +0000; In this case no, the rules only state that the 1830-1835 section be left alone for DX. To try to cram everyone into 40 kHz would be bedlam. Don't forget to tune up to 1900 or so, it'll be packed. 73; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00041.html (8,386 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]