Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CQ160M\s+SSB\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CQ160M\s+SSB\s+Contest\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:38:18 -0500; What are you guys planning on doing in the 160m SSB contest as far as frequency use is concerned??? Is the FCC going to issue warnings to contesters if they operate from 1803 and up during the contes; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00081.html (7,835 bytes)
2. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:14:33 -0500; My recommendation would be try to to stay above 1843 as much as possible. According to the existing regulations, SSB modulation is permissible in the entire 160m band. So, the FCC can't "warn" you fo; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00082.html (8,789 bytes)
3. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:40:19 -0600; I hope if anyone operates SSB below 1843 they copy CW well. I intend to contest, but WILL NOT USE PHONE below 43. If anyone else does they are lids. Dan/W4NTI as frequency use is concerned??? Is the; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00083.html (8,540 bytes)
4. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 12:04:13 -0800 (PST); I think that too many people have misinterpreted the comments that Riley Hollingsworth has made about 160 meters. I have never heard him come out and say that "you can't operate SSB below 1843". He w; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00084.html (11,083 bytes)
5. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:01:48 -0500; bad behavior and disrespect for others = bigger scores Or do I have that wrong? 73, Tom W8JI W8JI@contesting.com -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Admi; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00085.html (7,593 bytes)
6. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:25:49 -0500; Like I said. If everyone is contesting with SSB throughout the entire band during the CQWW160 SSB contest then I will join them. If it's legal and will only impact the band for a single contest weeke; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00086.html (9,212 bytes)
7. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:27:35 -0500; Actually it is unfortunate CQ Magazine and other contest promoters don't suggest people follow bandplans, and behave properly. People would certainly work a lot more DX if they operated split, but t; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00087.html (8,477 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]