Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CW\s+Sprint\s+vs\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s+QRM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+CW\s+Sprint\s+vs\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s+QRM\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:03:40 -0500; I couldn't help but notice there is another RTTY contest - CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest (0000Z, Feb 12 to 2400Z, Feb 13 ) scheduled next weekend. The NA CW Sprint, which is a very popular contest in the US; /archives//html/SECC/2005-02/msg00025.html (7,193 bytes)
2. [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM (score: 1): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:31:36 -0500; Jeff brings up a good point--better scheduling to avoid these conflicts is the best bet. But realistically, the CQWW WPX has also been around a while, and is probably about as big a RTTY contest as t; /archives//html/SECC/2005-02/msg00026.html (8,938 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]