Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+California\s+QSO\s+party\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+California\s+QSO\s+party\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] California QSO party (score: 1): Author: knason00 at gmail.com (Kevan Nason); Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:43:42 -0400; Hi all, Planning on doing the CAQP in a couple weeks. I'm not much of a CW operator anymore and haven't done many state QSO parties. What are some suggestions for an efficient way to call CQ for this; /archives//html/SECC/2011-09/msg00032.html (7,118 bytes)
2. [SECC] California QSO party (score: 1): Author: k1zzi at comcast.net (Ralph K1ZZI); Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:24:10 -0400; Hi Kevan, Excellent question! The out of state station calls CQ CA. California stations use CAQP. Same for any state QSO Party. Outside stations call CQ CA, GA, TN etc. (the state you are calling). O; /archives//html/SECC/2011-09/msg00033.html (8,302 bytes)
3. [SECC] California QSO party (score: 1): Author: k4bai at att.net (John T. Laney III); Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:20:53 -0400; There is a club combined score combination in the CAL QSO Party. SECC has come in second to TCG or CCO several times. Maybe we can win it this year. The top individual scorers usually get bottles of; /archives//html/SECC/2011-09/msg00034.html (7,590 bytes)
4. [SECC] California QSO party (score: 1): Author: k1zzi at comcast.net (Ralph K1ZZI); Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 22:46:02 -0400; Oops.. Actually CAQP is not the correct term used in this contest! It's always CQP of course. I knew something didn't look right. Thanks to john K4BAI for the correction. 73, Ralph K1ZZI -- Original; /archives//html/SECC/2011-09/msg00036.html (8,658 bytes)
5. [SECC] California QSO party (score: 1): Author: knason00 at gmail.com (Kevan Nason); Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 07:39:46 -0400; Thanks for the replies. I would have messed things up without the advice. Probably spend most of my time on SSB since I'm more comfortable there, but will spend a good bit of time on CW as I'm thinki; /archives//html/SECC/2011-09/msg00037.html (7,290 bytes)
6. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney III); Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:56:17 -0400; Note that the CQP sponsor wants everyone to use the same four letter abbreviations for counties. This was somewhat different from the multiplier list I had in NA for CQP, but I edited the list to coi; /archives//html/SECC/2007-10/msg00030.html (6,490 bytes)
7. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y); Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:41:35 -0400; I didn't get in as much operating time as I had hoped, but here's my contribution. California QSO Party SOAB Low Power Operating time ~ 3 hours Band Mode QSOs Pts Sec 3.5 CW 2 6 0 7 CW 9 27 0 14 CW 4; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00072.html (6,170 bytes)
8. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y); Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:50:04 -0400; My apologies for this effort (way down from last year's). Unfortunately I picked up a case of the flu while traveling last week and just couldn't do much more. California QSO Party Single Operator, L; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00004.html (6,367 bytes)
9. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:05:44 -0500; Cqlifornia QSO party results. Call: K4SAV Operator: K4SAV Class: SO HP QTH: Al Band CW Qs Ph Qs Mult 3.5 38 0 0 7 97 0 1 14 136 50 51 21 70 33 1 totals: 341 83 53 Score 63,017 Time: 21.5 hrs Comments; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00005.html (6,696 bytes)
10. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: k4no at mchsi.com (Greg Richard); Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:06:28 -0500; Will the SECC be making a run at the top club score outside of California this year? CQP is Oct 1st, time to start making plans Greg K4NO; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00054.html (6,309 bytes)
11. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy); Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:23:27 -0400; Good item Greg! Last year the top three clubs in the CQP were: Contest Club Ontario - 30 logs, 1.1M points SECC - 20 logs, 757K points Tennessee Contest group - 20 logs, 721K points I'd like everyone; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00055.html (7,493 bytes)
12. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:56:00 -0400; I will be as active as possible for SECC in the CQP. Let's win the out of state club contest and some individual wine bottles too. 73, John, K4BAI.; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00059.html (6,412 bytes)
13. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:38:55 -0500; I hope to be on also. Give me a chance to check out my new beam. Got the Salmon Run this weekend. Always a good one. Have a Anniston AL Hamfest on Saturday so will not be a full time effort. Dan/W4NT; /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00067.html (7,667 bytes)
14. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y); Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:06:10 -0500; I haven't checked my calendar for that weekend, but I like Matt's idea. That would be a great contest to try to mount a club wide effort. I'm in. Kent, AE4Y; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00130.html (7,529 bytes)
15. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:27:15 -0500; I also propose we try to win the Sweepstakes medium class club category this year. If we set I goal like this I might be motivated to operate SS phone FT rather that my yearly 10 hr PT effort.... Of; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00139.html (8,762 bytes)
16. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:12:47 -0500; A very interesting proposition! Looking back at last year, we placed seventh. We had 25 entries (13 in CW, 12 in Phone) out of a maximum of 50. Here's how the top 7 clubs looked: Mad River Radio Club; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00176.html (9,376 bytes)
17. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: rwhiggins at bellsouth.net (rwhiggins@bellsouth.net); Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 23:52:46 -0500; Having recently moved from Florida, I was a member of the FCG and we had this same discussion a couple of years ago as our club grew in size. It was decided that the clubs primary goal was to encour; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00181.html (9,467 bytes)
18. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:32:55 -0500; I totally agree. At this point, it isn't an issue for the SECC, but it could become one. The way Jeff stated the goal was to win the Medium category. If we just wanted to place higher in the club com; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00212.html (9,761 bytes)
19. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:14:38 -0500; See the message below sent by NY4N to the cq-contest repeater. Read it and substitute SECC. However, I believe Jeff is wrong about eligibility to submit scores for a club. See my message sent in repl; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00350.html (9,550 bytes)
20. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1): Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:54:41 -0500; It's been a couple of weeks since I heard any real discussions here on the reflector regarding this weekend's California QSO Party. Is it still safe to say that the SECC is going to make a real conce; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00381.html (7,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]