Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Callsigns\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Callsigns (score: 1): Author: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy); Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:32:39 -0400; N4GG or NN4GG? Based on years past I don't think many folks came looking for me just for the NN4 prefix. Anyone got an opinion?? Hal -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lis; /archives//html/SECC/2009-05/msg00060.html (6,427 bytes)
2. [SECC] Callsigns (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:11:18 -0400; I don't think the prefix really matters that much for US stations....the confusion may cost you more than any additional Qs. -- Lee Hiers "Have Dobro Will Travel" -- next part -- An HTML attachment w; /archives//html/SECC/2009-05/msg00063.html (7,178 bytes)
3. [SECC] Callsigns (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:06:53 -0400; NN4 is pretty unusual. While AA4 is pretty common, it much more rare today than 20 years ago, since most people have upgraded to vanity calls with W, K or N. But I've never found any advantage to the; /archives//html/SECC/2009-05/msg00079.html (7,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]