Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Circle\s+shifting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Circle\s+shifting\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:33 -0500; Maybe someone will come up with a statistical program to determine how far we can temporarily shift the circle to include only the ops who commit to each particular contest. Gary - WB4SQ -- -- ______; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00403.html (10,548 bytes)
2. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:18:25 -0500; So what happens when 2 people commit that are impossible to fit in the circle. Someone is not going to be happy. Gordon Maybe someone will come up with a statistical program to determine how far we c; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00404.html (10,752 bytes)
3. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:34:05 -0500; -- -- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00405.html (12,362 bytes)
4. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: jonathan.schulz at siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:50:16 -0500; Before anyone's feelings get slighted I'd recomend you guy's ask Dan Henderson, N1ND ( dhenderson@arrl.org ) if it is indeed legal for you to "shift" the circle for different ARRL contests (I'd ventu; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00406.html (13,996 bytes)
5. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:52:43 -0500; In such a circumstance, I would suggest: 1. One of the 2 MUST currently be within the permanent circle. That person within the circle will retain their rights unless they waive them. Full, rather tha; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00407.html (7,454 bytes)
6. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:21:48 -0500; Back in the 70s or so, there was a contest club called the "Rubber Circle Contest Club"...I think they mainly re-shaped their "circle" to include folks. Too bad that's not a possibility. Lee -- Lee H; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00408.html (7,327 bytes)
7. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:00:21 -0500; I think the intentions here are good but the potential to upset someone is also there and not the intent. I agree with K9JS'S comments below regarding the spirit of the rules. If we can move the perm; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00410.html (7,246 bytes)
8. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:20:42 -0500; My inclination would be that, unless the members concerned agree between themselves, we would want to leave the circle where it is permanently situated at that time and not move it to include someone; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00413.html (7,155 bytes)
9. [SECC] Circle shifting (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:31:01 -0500; Someone recently posted that W4OC ( and he and Cort are the controls ) prefers domestic contests. IF such is true, no one would be excluded by a shift in an ARRL DX contest. I emphasize again that th; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00418.html (7,772 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]