Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Contest\s+Logging\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Contest\s+Logging\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:13:22 +0000; So what are folks using these days for single op contest logging? As much as I enjoyed using it, I suppose it's time to say goodbye to TRLog. Thanks, Jay, K4OGG -- next part -- An HTML attachment was; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00053.html (7,381 bytes)
2. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: ironbutttad at yahoo.com (Tad); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:27:53 +0000; N1MM is what I use Tad, WF4W Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile _______________________________________________ SECC mailing list SECC at contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/se; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00054.html (7,838 bytes)
3. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: gmacie at yahoo.com (Gordon Macie); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:45:19 -0700 (PDT); N1MM.. Good to see you Jay, It's been awhile. Gordon N4LR So what are folks using these days for single op contest logging?? As much as I enjoyed using it, I suppose it?s time to say goodbye to TRLog; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00055.html (8,377 bytes)
4. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: fdennin at numail.org (Fred Dennin); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:49:54 -0400; N1MM used here Jay. Excellent support and free. 73'?.Fred, WW4LL So what are folks using these days for single op contest logging? As much as I enjoyed using it, I suppose it?s time to say goodbye to; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00056.html (7,945 bytes)
5. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: Kt4zb at aol.com (Kt4zb at aol.com); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:07:18 -0400 (EDT); Hi Jay - N1MM (very happy with it) Jere, KT4ZB In a message dated 10/18/2011 6:13:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jpryor at uga.edu writes: So what are folks using these days for single op contest log; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00057.html (7,786 bytes)
6. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: k1zzi at comcast.net (Ralph K1ZZI); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:18:16 -0400; Jay, N1MM - Free and it comes with excellent support. Ralph K1ZZI So what are folks using these days for single op contest logging? As much as I enjoyed using it, I suppose it's time to say goodbye t; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00058.html (8,463 bytes)
7. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: w5jr.lists at att.net (W5JR - Mike); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:29:10 -0400; I'm on the N1MM train. Been using it for several years. Steep learning curve but excellent performance, flexibility and outstanding support. Unless you have a pretty fast computer, and even if you do; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00059.html (8,932 bytes)
8. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:58:35 -0400; Still using WRITELOG here, but I have developed a very mellow attitude about all this. The best logging software is the one you are most familiar with, assuming it has most or all of the features. K5; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00060.html (9,068 bytes)
9. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:12:37 -0400; I agree with that. N1MM acted more like TR than the others available when I switched, so I tried it and liked it. I think there is a TR4Win out there now, but I've never messed with it, having gotten; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00061.html (8,646 bytes)
10. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: knason00 at gmail.com (Kevan Nason); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:13:25 -0400; Like most, I use N1MM. Used Writelog for awhile, Think I still have current license to update,but gave N1MM a try and liked it enough to stop paying for updates. Now, like was said before, I'm more f; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00062.html (9,617 bytes)
11. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:41 -0400; I still have Writelog but I see no reason to hook up my Yaesu Transceivers to the PC again as it makes the program very complicated. I usually operate just a few hours now and usually single band as; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00067.html (8,812 bytes)
12. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: nj8j at benshome.net (Ben Coleman NJ8J); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:51:48 -0400; Since the shack computer uses Linux, I use tlf when I can. Sometimes it's not set up for a particular contest, in which case I drag out an old DOS computer I keep around and use CT or NA. I tried onc; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00068.html (8,138 bytes)
13. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:10:55 -0400; You might want to look at the power supply on your laptop - I thought my laptop was noisy until I pulled the plug and realized it was fine, it was just the switching suppy that was eating the bands a; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00069.html (7,918 bytes)
14. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: w4mja at yahoo.com (Michael Almeter); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:28:50 -0700 (PDT); I use Writelog in my station with some pretty good results. I may still change to N1MM, as I'm in the middle of rebuilding my station, and will examine the differences between the two.? I don't quite; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00070.html (9,681 bytes)
15. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:31:16 -0400; That's one of the main reasons to go with computer logging IMO - to keep up with band/mode changes and bandmap stuff. I can't imagine doing a contest without the radio interface.; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00071.html (8,457 bytes)
16. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: aldermant at windstream.net (Tommy Alderman); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:33:20 -0400; N1MM is a contest program, it is NOT a logging program! If you want a contest program, in my opinion it is very hard to beat. However if you want a logging program, again in my opinion, you should lo; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00072.html (9,110 bytes)
17. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: dbmcalpine at earthlink.net (Dennis McAlpine); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:55:47 -0400; Dave, It sounds like you are really looking for a logging program and then for a contesting program. There is a world of difference between these two things. A logging program is generally poor for c; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00075.html (10,144 bytes)
18. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:07:20 -0400; All I asked about was which program is the best contest logger. Writelog is easy to use as a contest logger but can be a nightmare to hook to a rig. They do not keep up with USB ports and continue to; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00078.html (8,855 bytes)
19. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:22:27 -0400; I find N1MM extremely easy to use. Part of that is the program itself, and part of it is the way I have it set up. It does have a pretty steep learning curve. I do think that it may be too powerful f; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00079.html (8,536 bytes)
20. [SECC] Contest Logging (score: 1): Author: w4dd at arrl.net (Jeff W4DD); Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:46:39 -0400; A few more comments. No shortage of opinions on this topic. CT ? old now, but great in its day NA ? Good but dated also WriteLog ? Good, but didn?t find it overly user friendly NA ? Very Good, but wa; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00080.html (9,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]