Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Dwindling\s+Net\s+Participation\s+\-\s+Your\s+comments\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Dwindling\s+Net\s+Participation\s+\-\s+Your\s+comments\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: w4mja at yahoo.com (Michael Almeter); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:39:59 -0700 (PDT); Hello Everyone,?? The South East Contest Club's net has been meeting now for about a month. For the first two weeks of the net, we had a great turnout and active participation. But as of lately, it s; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00118.html (8,262 bytes)
2. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: aldermant at windstream.net (Tommy Alderman); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:04:30 -0400; Hi Mike, Keep in mind that this represents my personal opinion only! I think the idea of having a SECC SSB net was to generate a place (or frequency) where the active contesters (a very small percent; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00119.html (9,716 bytes)
3. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: w4ax.mack at gmail.com (Mack McCormick); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:09:19 -0400; Mike, I think you do a fantastic job. I've always found that nets last when they serve a purpose. May I suggest that you have a topic each week and publish that in advance. It could cover any aspect; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00120.html (10,205 bytes)
4. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: jjmmc at juno.com (jjmmc at juno.com); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:30:08 GMT; Mike: Regretfully, I have missed the last several nets. Not because I forgot or feel asleep in my easy chair but because I was out of town on business and was mandated to family commitments. Possibly; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00122.html (8,246 bytes)
5. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: ironbutttad at yahoo.com (Tad Williamson); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:07:44 -0700 (PDT); Mike, I only checked in the first night, so far.? This week I was without a radio in the shack and last week I was getting ready for the GQP. I was really looking forward to checking in last night, b; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00123.html (9,234 bytes)
6. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: w5jr.lists at att.net (W5JR - Mike); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:56:44 -0400; These sound like a plan Mack & Mike. I'm bummed I will miss a couple of nets in early May while I'm /KH6. I'm sure no one is feeling too much sympathy for me. I need to work on that remote access HF; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00125.html (11,272 bytes)
7. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: knason00 at gmail.com (Kevan Nason); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:08:05 -0400; Well, I for one work every other Wednesday -- and if something comes up on my only night of the week off (that I didn't have to work at least a part of the day) then I won't be able to make it on tho; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00126.html (12,465 bytes)
8. [SECC] Dwindling Net Participation - Your comments? (score: 1): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:08:54 -0400; I think it might be tough to keep any net busy. The idea of topics that might have a broad interest is a good one, and might accomplish that. I'm delighted Tommy got his RFI fixed, although I missed; /archives//html/SECC/2011-04/msg00127.html (7,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]