Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[FCG\]\s+long\s+QST\/ARRL\s+rant\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[FCG\]\s+long\s+QST\/ARRL\s+rant\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Fw: [FCG] long QST/ARRL rant (score: 1): Author: w4svo at att.net (Mark Luhrman); Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:22:49 -0700 (PDT); CRITIQUING QST By Charly Harpole, K4VUD ? ? ? ? ? QST, ?Devoted Entirely to Amateur Radio,? has been a major feature of ham radio for longer than even oldsters can remember.? It has been the one cons; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00015.html (17,128 bytes)
2. [SECC] Fw: [FCG] long QST/ARRL rant (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:28:42 -0400; Is this really relevant to the SECC and contesting in general , which is the purpose of this reflector? If you have a problem with the ARRL contact them. The SECC reflector isn't the proper forum. We; /archives//html/SECC/2011-10/msg00018.html (6,908 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]