Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+Petition\s+Regarding\s+Skimmer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+Petition\s+Regarding\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e); Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 14:26:47 -0400; Please consider signing this petition if you are opposed to Skimmer being allowed in the Single Opr category. The link is http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/skimmer If you sign it, please use your na; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00002.html (8,970 bytes)
2. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: k4ea at k4ea.net (Neal Sulmeyer); Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 14:40:52 -0400; I oppose it in ALL categories. Neal Sulmeyer, K4EA --Original Message-- From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of ku8e Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 14:; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00003.html (9,719 bytes)
3. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 00:47:19 -0400; Amen! -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00004.html (7,169 bytes)
4. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 09:11:35 -0500; Skimmer is certainly a topic worthy of debate about it's place in the rules, but before I jump to a conclusion, I'd like to see real-world data on contesting with Skimmer -- maybe even try it myself.; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00012.html (7,743 bytes)
5. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: nq4i at contesting.com (Rick Dougherty NQ4I); Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 10:41:08 -0400; Hi Gary and SECC...I am in the same interest about skimmer...I am not going to condem it yet...it needs to be used in a contest and actually see it's uses...for my part as a M-M , it will maybe fill; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00013.html (9,272 bytes)
6. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy); Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 15:14:30 -0500; I am with Rick and Gary. IMHO it is WAY too early to be signing petitions for or against. I'd like the opportunity to try it in a real contest and se/hear other's views based on on-the-air trials. I'; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00017.html (9,450 bytes)
7. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: dbmcalpine at earthlink.net (Dennis McAlpine); Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 15:27:40 -0400; I think back to the good old days when anything above 800 meters (or was it 200 meters; anyway, anything above the BC band) was considered useless, I wonder what would have happened if we all said ge; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00019.html (10,838 bytes)
8. [SECC] Fw: Petition Regarding Skimmer (score: 1): Author: w4dd at arrl.net (Jeff W4DD); Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 11:52:27 -0400; CW Skimmer seems to be an elaborate version of WriteLog. WriteLog decodes 6 or 7 channels of CW, Skinner looks at the whole band. It certainly makes the mult operators job easier (in a MM station). N; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00034.html (10,162 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]