Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+GQP\-2004\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+GQP\-2004\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:14:29 -0500; There is no longer any such requirement. This was originally written into the bylaws because it was required by the ARRL. They have since amended their rules. We did have a meeting and voted to chang; /archives//html/SECC/2003-09/msg00012.html (6,420 bytes)
2. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:13:03 -0500; Sorry for the long delayed response.... This was discussed at the June ATL Hamfest meeting of the SECC. We decided it was better to leave the GQP on a consistant date every year, rather than try to w; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00039.html (7,620 bytes)
3. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: tbdrake at charter.net (Tom Drake); Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 16:20:11 -0500; This; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00040.html (8,485 bytes)
4. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (Jeff Clarke); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:23:00 -0500; We should be more concerned with getting out this years results then the date of next years contest... == Jeffrey D. Clarke 706-628-9672 email : ku8e@bellsouth.net ==; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00044.html (8,771 bytes)
5. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: SavageBR at aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:59:25 -0500; We cannot effect this years results -- we can do a lot to effect next years results!! Bruce AA4Z; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00045.html (7,527 bytes)
6. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:19:15 -0500; Folks I'm tired of holding on to this money for plaques. Can we get some results for 2003? KD3UC will you please let us know the status? Thanks/73, Jay, K4OGG; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00050.html (9,731 bytes)
7. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:50:32 -0500; The problem with having consistency by having the GQP so many weekends from Easter each year is that there is no telling what contest we would conflict with. This would be the most inconsistent sched; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00053.html (7,701 bytes)
8. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: tbdrake at charter.net (Tom Drake); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:32:57 -0500; Maybe it's time for a re-vote, now that we have managed to analyze all the problems with the April schedule. I agree that anchoring the contest on Easter would confuse just about everyone and produce; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00056.html (8,865 bytes)
9. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:07:56 -0500; -- This matter was voted on and passed by an overwhelming majority. I see no reason to continually argue about this matter. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00059.html (7,508 bytes)
10. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (Jeff Clarke); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:32:05 -0500; I agree 100% with Ed... This and other issues concerning GQP were hashed over at the meeting. In the end the majority ruled. It would be nice if we had more meetings per year so these issues could be; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00060.html (8,648 bytes)
11. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (Jeff Clarke); Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:33:20 -0500; This idea was shot down at the Atlanta meeting. The majority wanted it to stay at 20 hours... == Jeffrey D. Clarke 706-628-9672 email : ku8e@bellsouth.net ==; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00061.html (9,923 bytes)
12. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: w4dd at arrl.net (Jeff); Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:29:39 -0500; Perhaps voting on line for future issues is the answer. Seems like the hamfest attendance is too thin. Jeff, W4DD I agree 100% with Ed... This and other issues concerning GQP were hashed over at the; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00073.html (9,103 bytes)
13. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: SavageBR at aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com); Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:51:51 -0500; Yes, Yes. Good idea. Bruce; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00074.html (7,346 bytes)
14. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: tbdrake at charter.net (Tom Drake); Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:56:12 -0500; I really do agree with Ed. No need to continually argue about this. Besides, Easter Sunday won't interrupt my contesting. Probably use my wife's vehicle, radio and gas money to do it. Have to get a l; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00075.html (10,580 bytes)
15. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 23:48:06 -0500; -- If the attendance is too thin, it's not the fault of those who did attend. While I support the idea that one's family comes first, I am getting a little tired of the excuses; wife's family in tow; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00077.html (8,013 bytes)
16. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:46:11 -0500; I would still like us to scale back the GQP to a Saturday only event. Maybe from 8AM - Midnight.... Jeff; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00079.html (11,376 bytes)
17. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 16:24:17 -0500; Is there any requirement for attending eyeball meetings to maintain membership in SECC? Dan/W4NTI the; /archives//html/SECC/2003-08/msg00083.html (8,824 bytes)
18. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: SavageBR at aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com); Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 07:46:53 -0500; Looking at the calendar, it appears the GQP will fall on Easter Sunday. This year's GQP on Palm Sunday was a problem for some. Should we consider moving it one week later in 2004? Bruce AA4Z; /archives//html/SECC/2003-05/msg00073.html (6,511 bytes)
19. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:15:46 -0500; If you would move it a week earlier there would not be a conflict with any "major" contests. The only problem is that it would be a week after CQ WPX SSB. People might be too burned out to want to sp; /archives//html/SECC/2003-05/msg00075.html (8,566 bytes)
20. [SECC] GQP-2004 (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:06:25 -0500; How about moving it around the first weekend in June and encourage emergency power operations. Maybe as a prep for Field Day. Gary - WB4SQ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Cal; /archives//html/SECC/2003-05/msg00076.html (9,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]