Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NCJ\s+NA\s+Sprint\s+SSB\s+Team\s+Scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NCJ\s+NA\s+Sprint\s+SSB\s+Team\s+Scores\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] NCJ NA Sprint SSB Team Scores (score: 1): Author: k4bai at att.net (John Laney); Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:39:52 -0500; Hello guys: We could actually win the team competition! Our team claimed score is 59,609. That is with all ten members reporting. N7WA has it lower since N4OX checked the wrong team on the pull down; /archives//html/SECC/2012-02/msg00059.html (7,184 bytes)
2. [SECC] NCJ NA Sprint SSB Team Scores (score: 1): Author: jpwb2ekk at aol.com (jpwb2ekk at aol.com); Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:35:57 -0500 (EST); Hi, John - well, I'm glad my very casual effort helped a bit. I used to be more interested in the SSB Sprint back in the late 80's and activity seemed way, way higher then - but 40M fone was also a m; /archives//html/SECC/2012-02/msg00079.html (8,637 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]