Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Possible\s+club\s+call\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Possible\s+club\s+call\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:56:40 -0400; There was some discussion about a club call for SECC some time ago. There is a call that will be available soon that might fill the bill. Don't know if getting the SK's XYL to ask the FCC to give the; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00046.html (7,650 bytes)
2. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:51:30 +0000; It still applies, although it is expressed as family, not as a specific individual. Lokk at the FAQs on Vanity calls and it mentions it. BTW, I'm not real sure that in this case, you have to wait the; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00047.html (8,055 bytes)
3. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:31:07 -0400; Hi John, de Joe aa4nn Thanks for explaning how you go about checking death certificates, getting calls lined up, etc. What it looks like to me is a CRAP SHOOT with the FCC as far as trying for a spec; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00062.html (7,926 bytes)
4. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:28:42 -0400 (EDT); There is nothing random about the selection process. My data tells me that the last application entered ONLINE on the day a callsign is available will get the callsign in question. Case study: Whiske; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00063.html (9,074 bytes)
5. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Edward W. Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:03:16 +0000; Fellows, I have worked at this since the Vanity program opened. Think I have the bookmarks on the office computer and will see if I can't quote chapter and verse. However, ANY thought that the proces; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00064.html (7,946 bytes)
6. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:12:26 -0400; I guess this means he who applies first loses and he who applies last wins. Seems upside down to me. I've concerned myself about how to be first in line, now I am thinking about how to get on the tai; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00065.html (7,747 bytes)
7. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:14:45 -0400 (EDT); You are incorrect about the process when the flood gates opened. I did extensive research with guys who submitted applications on the web and noted the times in which they submitted their application; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00066.html (10,465 bytes)
8. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:31:30 +0000; I thought I made it absolutely clear that the procedure has changed. I furthermore have no doubt at all that the reason for the change was to allow the FCC to favor those they wished. My only thought; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00067.html (7,996 bytes)
9. [SECC] Possible club call (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:45:06 -0400 (EDT); As for the club callsign... I would suggest following Ed's advice. I'm outta the loop. 73 Bill -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative re; /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00068.html (8,944 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]