Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Power\s+level\s+for\s+NAQP\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Power\s+level\s+for\s+NAQP\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: Ben Coleman" <oloryn@mindspring.com (Ben Coleman); Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 18:46:43 -0500; What's the correct maximum power level for NAQP? I've seen both 100W(NCJ rules) and 150W(ARRL contest page). The reason I ask is that my DX-77T nominally runs 100W, but the MFJ SWR meter on my tuner(; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00008.html (7,867 bytes)
2. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: k4ab@email.msn.com (Larry Crim); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 19:40:15 -0500; Its 100 watts now...the rule was changed to prevent guys from using their amp to increase power levels to 150w. GL!, -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00009.html (8,755 bytes)
3. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: wb4sqq@yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 18:08:03 -0700 (PDT); Don't forget all the power the tuner 'eats up!'... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/ -- FAQ on WWW:; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00010.html (9,925 bytes)
4. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 22:02:16 -0400; The rules were changed recently and the power limit for NAQP is now 100 watts. 73, John, K4BAI. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative r; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00011.html (7,226 bytes)
5. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 02:32:26 -0400; I always thought some of the off-shore rigs maxed at 150 watts, until I scanned the ads in QST magazine. The ads I saw said 100 watts, USA rigs included. Knowing that, why in the world would a contes; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00012.html (8,044 bytes)
6. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:58:53 -0400; I'd believe the specifications of your rig sooner than the MFJ power meter. I'd leave the switch where it is. You're likely within the limits of the rules, and certainly within the spirit of them. Bi; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00014.html (7,785 bytes)
7. [SECC] Power level for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:20:26 -0400; I think the 150 watt power level is a historical artifact from the era of rigs with two 6146 finals which could put out as much as 125 watts on some bands. Today, the FT1000 (plain and "D"), IC-781,; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00016.html (8,587 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]