Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+Front\s+End\s+Saver\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+Front\s+End\s+Saver\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Re: [SEDXC] Front End Saver? (score: 1): Author: Ernie" <erniez@hatcreekcopy.com (Ernie); Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 11:03:04 -0500; Many thanks to Bob W4OWY, and Bridget KS4YT who both offered assistance in getting a copy of the article. K4PI also suggested an ICE device as an alternative solution. After scouring and reading the; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00026.html (8,434 bytes)
2. [SECC] Re: [SEDXC] Front End Saver? (score: 1): Author: k4ab@email.msn.com (Larry Crim); Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:26:31 -0600; or Don't think so. This has been discussed ad infinitum on the FT-1000MP reflector and the so called "experts" seem to think a "front end saver" for the RX input is not necessary. Your mileage may v; /archives//html/SECC/2001-03/msg00028.html (9,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]