Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SC\s+QP\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SC\s+QP\?\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] SC QP??? (score: 1): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:28:08 -0400; I finally have some antennas up in the air again. So I thought the SC QP would be a great chance to see how these new wires work. In some 8 hours of listening and calling CQ SCQP on 20/40/80, I found; /archives//html/SECC/2007-09/msg00058.html (7,017 bytes)
2. [SECC] SC QP??? (score: 1): Author: n3zl.radio at gmail.com (Greg Davis); Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:16 -0400; Hello, I found the exact same thing! My plan was to get on 80/40/20 CW and hand out my Florence county multiplier all day... or more likely, at least have moderate activity. What actually happened wa; /archives//html/SECC/2007-09/msg00059.html (8,353 bytes)
3. [SECC] SC QP??? (score: 1): Author: dbmcalpine at earthlink.net (Dennis McAlpine); Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:48:52 -0400 (EDT); An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20070917/40972a19/attachment.htm; /archives//html/SECC/2007-09/msg00060.html (6,450 bytes)
4. [SECC] SC QP??? (score: 1): Author: paul at ai4mt.com (Paul Jones); Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:58:31 -0400; An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20070918/92d75a1d/attachment.htm; /archives//html/SECC/2007-09/msg00062.html (6,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]