Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SECC\s+Discussion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SECC\s+Discussion\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] SECC Discussion (score: 1): Author: aldermant at windstream.net (Tommy Alderman); Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:51:08 -0400; I would appreciate it if the discussion and the pure guessing about 'in-fighting' within the SECC could stop. Your continued guessing just means you're either missing out of some good DX'ing or you'r; /archives//html/SECC/2010-10/msg00070.html (6,904 bytes)
2. [SECC] SECC Discussion (score: 1): Author: arcub at alltel.net (archie mckay); Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 12:17:59 -0500; This is not the first year I have read with interest the various views of what or how the club should be. My sense is, after reading the comments this year, that there are basically two schools of th; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00033.html (8,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]