Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SSSSB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SSSSB\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:14:03 -0500; I really don't think we should look at it like this. I don't believe we should limit the number of participants to 28. Yes, 50 entries is the limit for medium class, but if we have more members who; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00155.html (8,231 bytes)
2. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:36:09 -0500; Well, I may have read Bill wrong...if so, I apologize. Maybe better wording would have been "Let's go, we need 28 SSB ops!". Anyway....Let's go, we need 28 SSB ops! I'm thinking about doing that also; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00156.html (7,460 bytes)
3. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:39:38 -0600; It's like this guys. I have invited several of the local club over to operate in SSPhone. If they show up I'll enter "U". If not I'll likely go SOLP again as usual. Doubt I'll make it full time tho.; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00158.html (9,732 bytes)
4. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: w4atl at earthlink.net (Sherman Banks); Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:38:38 -0500; As I understand it, U is Single Op with Packet. With the multiple people you are having over to operate, you would be an M.; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00159.html (10,144 bytes)
5. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:58:34 -0600; Come to think of it.....I will have to re-read again... hi. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00160.html (11,578 bytes)
6. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:16:52 -0500; I totally agree with you. I was just saying we have plenty of room - 28 logs is quite a few. I didn't mean to imply we would jerrymander the category. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00161.html (7,480 bytes)
7. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: rwhiggins at bellsouth.net (Robert Higgins); Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:48:03 -0500; I will not be able to be FT. So if my playing around upsets the planning, let me know and I don't have to put SECC on the club line of my log. BTW, I have some ideas on how the SECC can remain in th; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00177.html (8,968 bytes)
8. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (k4sb@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:05:58 +0000; Besides thinking your comments are way out of line, perhaps you can explain how we can get 28 ops to go full time, when out of over 100 members of the Club, we only got 18 CW logs. Personally, I wil; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00188.html (7,439 bytes)
9. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:09:27 -0500; Sure, let's hear 'em. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00189.html (7,111 bytes)
10. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:15:55 -0500; You go ahead and go for it Bob. Looks like we have slots open. One easy way is to limit membership to 50 members.... I kinda don't like that idea. Although, at the moment, I wonder if we really have; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00202.html (7,691 bytes)
11. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:18:27 -0500; I've seen 23 callsigns active for CW. Which was up from last year. Now, that's something I think we all can agree one -- Ed is just too damn old. <big friendly grin> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail; /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00203.html (7,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]