Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Sweepstakes\s+Club\s+Competition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Sweepstakes\s+Club\s+Competition\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:24:14 -0500; The SECC came in 2nd place in the medium club competition for 2004 SS. Nice job everyone !!! The 2004 ARRL November Phone Sweepstakes Affiliated Club Competition Medium Category -- Southern Californi; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00157.html (8,942 bytes)
2. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:15:24 -0400; That's not bad at all folks! At our average points per entry, we would only need only 4 more entries to have tied for first. Doggone close, and we also beat some big clubs who had more entries. I jus; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00160.html (8,494 bytes)
3. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:27:26 -0500; ALRIGHT....GO SECC. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00163.html (10,673 bytes)
4. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:14:32 +0000; -- Heartily agree with those who say this is the year we take #1. A lousy 400,000 points would do it. We need to start planning, and get committments from all those who will operate, on SSB, CW or b; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00164.html (8,139 bytes)
5. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: k4ro at k4ro.net (K4RO Kirk Pickering); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:09:19 -0500; Congratulations folks! Y'all done well. I think OM Bill would be proud. Here's hoping that someday one of or clubs can take the west coast in SS... Signed, TCG Lurker K4RO; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00165.html (7,847 bytes)
6. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:28:06 -0400; Given my meager station, I recognize that I don't have much of a chance of winning any contest as a single operator (that doesn't keep me from generating RF though!), but I sure do get pumped up when; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00166.html (9,141 bytes)
7. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: w4atl at earthlink.net (Sherman Banks); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:13:42 -0400; I also like when we get organized for a contest. It certainly provides motivation for me to get on both weekends.; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00167.html (10,360 bytes)
8. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: jonathan.schulz at siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:42:56 -0500; Nice job guys! Being close to the top is a strong motivator. SMC placed 2nd in the Unlimited Category (thoroughly trounced by the imaginative & highly motivated NCCC Guys). They were motivated after; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00170.html (9,298 bytes)
9. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:24:33 +0000; Yes, that is what I meant. Appreciate Jon's comments, but fail to understand how this would be an "ethics" problem. Perhaps someone can explain it. It's not covered in my "Sweepstakes for Absolute Du; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00173.html (8,621 bytes)
10. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: jonathan.schulz at siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:08:46 -0500; For my peace of mind and to avoid Ed's sarcasm in the future, I am copying Dan Henderson with this email, he can tell us both if it's ok or not. What say Dan? Since I doubt Dan is subscribed to the S; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00174.html (10,393 bytes)
11. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:27:29 -0400; SECC members who have been with the club for a few years will remember that it was a result of our participation and good scores in a number of contests that allowed us to have a part in selecting th; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00175.html (11,841 bytes)
12. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:07:52 -0400; See ARRL club competition rules below. K4SB has misinterepted the rules. You cannot have a different club circle for different ARRL contests. Did we do this for SS ??? All stations and all operators; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00176.html (11,443 bytes)
13. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 17:08:36 -0500; Sorry Jon.....once a yankee....always a yankee. I've been here over 30 years.... hi. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00178.html (9,093 bytes)
14. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:50:05 +0000; In the first place, I did not mean to imply sarcasm. It was simply a honest question. In the second place, it is sometimes called "good ethics" if you request permission before you pass an email to; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00181.html (8,942 bytes)
15. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:17:25 -0400; There is absolutely nothing that prevents changing the center of the circle from one day to the next in the rules you quoted Jeff. We had this discussion last year, and while I'm not sure I agree wit; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00182.html (9,160 bytes)
16. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: rwhiggins at bellsouth.net (rwhiggins@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:59:24 -0400; Yes, but... The 6 day period is self imposed. The club can make that time period any length it wants. There is no ARRL rule governing this. It seems to me that we have approved the idea of changing; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00187.html (11,057 bytes)
17. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:42:35 -0400; I missed that Bob cc'd the reflector.... Yes, the club can, but as-is, we have the 6-day rule...that is apparently what was decided when the rule was implemented. 8.1.1. The CW and Phone mode are con; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00188.html (9,273 bytes)
18. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: rwhiggins at bellsouth.net (rwhiggins@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:14:00 -0400; Then I guess all is well. Does someone take care of the following regarding eligibilty lists for the different circles? 8.3.3.To be eligible to submit a score in the Affiliated Club Competition, ope; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00189.html (9,862 bytes)
19. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:06:19 +0000; No, I did NOT misinterpret the rules. I asked a simple question ABOUT the rules for SS. And as far as I know, we have never done this with SS. However, it is perfectly legal and well within the rule; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00190.html (9,447 bytes)
20. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:22:27 +0000; Right! But, better read that bylaw again. There is a specific line in it which says the move made be made permanent. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00192.html (8,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]