- 1. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: fdennin at numail.org (Fred Dennin)
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:52:14 -0400
- YES for W4AN nomination. Fred, WW4LL
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00041.html (5,985 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB)
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 01:59:43 +0000
- Just a quick note. There have been 20 + ballots submitted so far, and all have been "yes". Final results will be announced Thursday. However, I believe it will be unanimous. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00055.html (6,171 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] vote (score: 1)
- Author: nq4i at contesting.com (Rick Dougherty NQ4I)
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:26:49 -0400
- for W4AN to Hall of Fame
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00057.html (6,023 bytes)
- 4. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: jfglisson at bellsouth.net (jfglisson@bellsouth.net)
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:10:43 -0500
- I vote "YES" for the amendment of Article II, Section 1 to add the title of "Treasurer" to the list of SECC officers. -Rick N4XMX
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00145.html (6,070 bytes)
- 5. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:52:37 -0500
- I vote yes to adding officer to SECC. Dan/W4NTI Daniel Jeswald w4nti@mindspring.com Why Wait? Move to EarthLink.
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00177.html (5,972 bytes)
- 6. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: james.nail at earthlink.net (James Nail)
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:58:41 -0500
- My VistaPrint Electronic Business CardWA2MBP votes Yes James B. Nail
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00119.html (6,371 bytes)
- 7. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:49:58 -0500
- KU8E votes yes
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00121.html (6,421 bytes)
- 8. [SECC] vote (score: 1)
- Author: ROG1984 at aol.com (ROG1984@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:25:21 -0500
- WA4TII VOTES YES
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00124.html (6,271 bytes)
- 9. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: skazmarek at mindspring.com (E. Kazmarek)
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:28:33 -0500
- K4EAK votes YES (even if the wording of the amendment might need to be clarified)
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00126.html (6,410 bytes)
- 10. [SECC] Vote (score: 1)
- Author: fdennin at numail.org (Fred Dennin)
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:27:32 -0500
- WW4LL Votes Yes for the amendment.
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00133.html (6,319 bytes)
- 11. [SECC] vote (score: 1)
- Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:46:48 -0500
- Just what are we voting on? Dan/W4NTI
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00145.html (6,270 bytes)
- 12. [SECC] vote (score: 1)
- Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:54:33 -0500
- A motion to make changes to the constitution and by-laws sumitted by K4SB as I recall. Just what are we voting on? Dan/W4NTI _______________________________________________ SECC mailing list SECC@con
- /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00147.html (6,952 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu