Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+W4AN\s+on\s+CQ\s+cover\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+W4AN\s+on\s+CQ\s+cover\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:03:16 -0500; In case y'all haven't seen it...there's a picture of W4AN on the cover of the CQ magazine that's on the newstand right now. I normally don't buy CQ, but wanted to have a look-see at the CQWW-CW resul; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00280.html (7,203 bytes)
2. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: rwhiggins at bellsouth.net (rwhiggins@bellsouth.net); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:44:57 -0500; I normally don't buy CQ Lee Hiers, AA4GA I subscribe to CQ, because as the sponsor of 2 of my favorite contests CQ WW CW and SSB, I hope they stay in business a long time. Something to think about. B; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00282.html (7,479 bytes)
3. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:29:57 -0500; Exactly the same reason I subscribe. I hate to even think of what would happen if they went out of business. BTW, 2 excellent articles in QST for October on pages 61 and 62. N0AX does an excellent j; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00283.html (7,780 bytes)
4. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:35:39 -0500; That's valid. But I'm generally not interested in anything they print other than the contest stuff, and I have a hard time supporting anything W5YI participates in - he absolutely sickens me. As far; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00287.html (8,381 bytes)
5. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:44:26 -0500; And you're not the only one. You should see the cancellations the FCC does to VEC group he has. One irregularity after another. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00289.html (7,656 bytes)
6. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:21:00 -0500; I know they had a bunch of those 'South of the Border' types cancelled. I was a VE with the ARRL. Maybe still am, but haven't done it in a while. One of the local groups uses W5YI, I don't think they; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00292.html (8,953 bytes)
7. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:33:41 -0500; The note from Lee reminds me to make a plea to support CQ Magazine and CQ Communications. Unlike ARRL with paid contest support, CQ provides the space for all their contests in the Magazine, provides; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00294.html (10,016 bytes)
8. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:41:01 -0500; With all due respect for Dan's "geography" ( ):> ), South Carolina is not South of the Border, unless you live in North Carolina of course. It's been a while, but I remember the FCC voided every sing; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00295.html (8,867 bytes)
9. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:28 -0500; South of the border refered to the folks in PR that got their tickets removed by not showing up for a re-test per RH order. Dan/W4NTI I while. problem. for; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00301.html (9,702 bytes)
10. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:09:21 -0500; Wow, don't know how I didn't remember that. There were tons of them. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00302.html (8,351 bytes)
11. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: k4wi at earthlink.net (Courtney Judd - K4WI); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:19:14 -0500; I agree with you Dave 100%... CQWW is unlike any other and I support CQ 100%. If I had to pick between CQ and QST it would be CQ hands down.. entered my first rtty contest last year and brought home; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00304.html (8,073 bytes)
12. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:42:54 -0500; I have to agree....CQ is hands down the better choice. I really hate to say it but.....IF I wasn't a LIFER with the league I wouldn't waste my money on a sub to QST. I have thought this for years, th; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00307.html (9,328 bytes)
13. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:41:17 -0500; My take (another lifer) is that if the ARRL really wanted to represent ham radio they would be closer to DC, close to the political dregs. Gary - WB4SQ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00308.html (10,377 bytes)
14. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:15:54 -0500; I think the ARRL contests are run much better than CQ. They are timely with the results and mailing you your plaques/certificates. Plus they publish the results online for everyone to see. It usually; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00309.html (9,390 bytes)
15. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:18:26 -0500; Speaking of plaques . . . How's the GQP coming? Any winners? 73, Jay, K4OGG; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00310.html (9,760 bytes)
16. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:23:31 -0500; I would also like to say that I am grateful the ARRL is around to represent our hobby... While I don't agree with everything they do I think they get it right most of the time. If it wasn't for the A; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00311.html (10,273 bytes)
17. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:46:18 -0500; Actually, beginning with the 2002 contest, CQ has published "expanded results" on the web. They also have .pdf files of the results as printed in the magazine from 1999 forward (except the 2003, whic; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00312.html (8,373 bytes)
18. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:09:19 -0500; How does it go???? "In a bureaucracy you eventually rise to your level of incompetence" Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00320.html (10,784 bytes)
19. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:19:54 -0500; I think another version is that "one is promoted to a level of incompetence" Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00321.html (7,454 bytes)
20. [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:20:49 -0500; Don't forget the one about 'lateral progression'.. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00324.html (7,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]