Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+What\s+would\s+you\s+do\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+What\s+would\s+you\s+do\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] What would you do? (score: 1): Author: scottstraw at mindspring.com (Scott Straw); Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:14:24 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I've sent the following message to Sean Kutzko, KX9X, at the ARRL Contesting Branch but thought I'd give y'all something to gnaw on other than a grizzled turkey bone for the next few days... So I was; /archives//html/SECC/2010-11/msg00123.html (8,052 bytes)
2. [SECC] What would you do? (score: 1): Author: toddatkins at gmail.com (Todd Atkins); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:03:58 -0500; I'd say he should just delete his Q as well and the problem will go away. There's no good solution to this since the Q shouldn't have been made in the first place but the other guy shouldn't be penal; /archives//html/SECC/2010-11/msg00127.html (9,325 bytes)
3. [SECC] What would you do? (score: 1): Author: rwhiggins at charter.net (Robert & Charlotte Higgins); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:59:05 -0500; You can't change the fact that you made the QSO. Yes, you shouldn't have, but you did. Hopefully, and likely, there will be not reprecussions. But you did make the Q and I think the log you submit sh; /archives//html/SECC/2010-11/msg00129.html (9,515 bytes)
4. [SECC] What would you do? (score: 1): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:03:19 -0500; Everyone just has to live with it. The real problem here is the silly idea that the other end gets docked extra points for mistakes someone else makes. They should just take bad QSO's out on both end; /archives//html/SECC/2010-11/msg00130.html (9,675 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]