- 1. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:19:35 +0000
- When I had POST make a .cab file (using 6.45) after SS Phone, it insisted that both the contest and my entry were CW. Anyone else notice this? 73, Pete Smith N4ZR n4zr@contesting.com Sometimes a towe
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00222.html (7,311 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto)
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 13:52:23 +0100
- Hi all, nothing to say about that, but.. POST does the extension as .cab Any news?? 73 Bob,I2WIJ - J49WI mailto:i2wij@qsl.net http://www.qsl.net/i2wij/ When I had POST make a .cab file (using 6.45) a
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00223.html (8,232 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:44:44 -0500
- I assume Bob was suggesting that because Windows thinks that a .cab file is a particular kind of compressed archive, used in common software installation programs. would probably be a good idea to ch
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00224.html (7,750 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: 22 Nov 1999 14:32:13 -0000
- This really doesn't matter. The .CAB suffix was used for something else in the call checking process. Since files go through e-mail, they will end up having to be renamed anyway. I have no idea what
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00225.html (7,561 bytes)
- 5. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: 22 Nov 1999 14:33:16 -0000
- Hmm - this could be a problem. I will figure it out and get it in 6.46. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-R
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00226.html (7,348 bytes)
- 6. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: fullgraf@kcc.com (Fullgraf, Chuck)
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:49:48 -0600
- My conversion for SS phone to the Cabrillo format in POST worked just fine. It shows SSB and phone as it is supposed to. There was a screen in POST during the formation of the Cabrillo format that as
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00227.html (8,271 bytes)
- 7. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 16:55:21 -0500
- OK, so now I gotta figure out how I made it happen.... too many people *didn't* have the problem I did. In my case, there were PHs throughout the body of the log, it was just the header that was wron
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00231.html (7,677 bytes)
- 8. [TRLog] .cab glitch? (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: 23 Nov 1999 05:08:58 -0000
- CW is the default and you do need to change it in the menu shown when you execute the Cabrillo function. It isn't smart enough to know that you want SSB. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00234.html (7,473 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu