- 1. [TRLog] ARRL DX Logs (score: 1)
- Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington)
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:42:16 -0600
- Is anyone else getting a POST 6.63a Cabrillo log rejected by the ARRL robot? 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott Ellington Madison, Wisconsin USA sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu -- "It is evident that if humanity is
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00070.html (6,559 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] ARRL DX Logs (score: 1)
- Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:08:30 -0800
- When you say rejected - what is the robot saying? Tree
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00071.html (6,230 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] ARRL DX Logs (score: 1)
- Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:50:27 -0800
- Bzzt. It was not the same robot response. Here is the response from your latest submission: ARRL DX CONTEST LOG WARNING MESSAGE REPORT FROM THE ROBOT CLUB: SMC Line 8 was discarded. The club name 'S
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00072.html (7,290 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] ARRL DX Logs (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:15:11 -0500
- The club warning aside, I was delighted to be told about 2-3 places in my log where, due to too-quick on-the-fly editing, I, using TR, had replaced the RST with the power. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00073.html (8,055 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu